Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Reena Kumari D/O Pappuram vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:2636)
2024 Latest Caselaw 276 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 276 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Reena Kumari D/O Pappuram vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:2636) on 16 January, 2024

Author: Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench: Praveer Bhatnagar

[2024:RJ-JP:2636]                   (1 of 3)                     [CRLR-1893/2023]


        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

            S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1893/2023

Reena Kumari D/o Pappuram, R/o Plot No. 704, Beed Sarkari
Kacchi Basti, Jda Ke Paas, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur.
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
                                                                ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Kankhadia, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

16/01/2024

The application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for

condonation of delay of three days in filing the revision petition is

allowed.

The present criminal revision petition is filed against the

order dated 31.08.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S.

Cases, Jaipur Metro-I, whereby, application under Sections 451

and 457 of Cr.P.C. for handing over the vehicle No.RJ-14-KG-4471

was dismissed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that learned trial

court vide order dated 31.08.2023 dismissed the application filed

by the petitioner under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. for

releasing the scooty vehicle No.RJ-14-KG-4471. He also submits

that petitioner is registered owner of the said vehicle and

contraband article containing 9.80 Gms. of Smack was recovered

[2024:RJ-JP:2636] (2 of 3) [CRLR-1893/2023]

from other accused Rahul Meena, to whom the petitioner bona

fidely give the vehicle.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that no

recovery of any contraband article was effected from the

petitioner. The petitioner was not aware about the fact that Rahul

Meena was carrying contraband articles. Therefore, the impugned

order passed by the learned trial court dated 31.08.2023 may be

set aside and possession of the vehicle may be handed over to the

petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor defends the impugned order

passed by learned trial court.

Considered the fact that petitioner is registered owner of the

vehicle, contraband article was recovered from the other accused

Rahul Meena and no recovery of any contraband article was

recovered from the present petitioner.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sunderbhai

Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat [2002 (9) SCC 283], has

opined that it is no use of keeping such seized vehicle at the Police

Stations for a long period and keeping the vehicle in an open place

is not only loss to the nation but to the property of the nation.

Thus, considering the above argument and keeping in view

the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat (supra), the instant

revision petition is allowed and the order dated 31.08.2023 is

hereby quashed and set aside and the vehicle No.RJ-14-KG-4471

in question is ordered to be released on 'supardgi' till the

completion of the trial upon following conditions:-

[2024:RJ-JP:2636] (3 of 3) [CRLR-1893/2023]

(a) the petitioner furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court and give undertaking to produce the vehicle No.RJ-

14-KG-4471 in the Court as and when required to do so.

(b) the petitioner shall get the vehicle scooty photographed showing the registration number as well as the chassis number. Such photograph shall be taken in the presence of the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case.

(c) the personal bond of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall carry the photographs of the petitioner and his sureties and the bonds of sureties shall further carry the photographs of persons identifying them before the Court which is with full residential particulars of the sureties and the persons identifying them.

(d) the petitioner shall undertake further not to transfer the ownership of the vehicle scooty and not to lease it to anyone and not to make or allow any changes in it to be made so as to make unidentifiable.

(e) the petitioner shall not allow the vehicle No.RJ- 14-KG-4471, to be used for any antisocial activities.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

47-SURAJ KUMAR

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter