Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Brahm Prakash Yadav S/O Sh. Umrav Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:6800)
2024 Latest Caselaw 1027 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1027 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Brahm Prakash Yadav S/O Sh. Umrav Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:6800) on 9 February, 2024

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2024:RJ-JP:6800]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                    S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18961/2023

Brahm Prakash Yadav S/o Sh. Umrav Singh, Aged About 60
Years, R/o Village Nasarpur, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-
Behror (Raj.).
                                                                        ----Petitioner
                                        Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Its The Principal Secretary,
         Department Of Revenue, Government Of Raj. Govt.
         Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.       The        Principal       Secretary,      Department         Of      Finance,
         Government Of Raj. Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.       The District Collector, District Kotputli- Behror (Raj.).
4.       The    Tehsildar (Land            Record), Tehsil           Behror,    District
         Kotputli- Behror (Raj.).
5.       The Director, Pension And Pensioner Welfare Department,
         Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.).
                                                                     ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Soni, AAG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

09/02/2024

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

issue involved in the present matter is no more res integra in view

of judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ramesh

Chander Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ

Petition No. 2800/2021; decided on 17.10.2023). It is

further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances, the

order of the Division Bench has also been followed by Co-ordinate

[2024:RJ-JP:6800] (2 of 3) [CW-18961/2023]

Bench in the case of Ramesh Chand vs. State of Rajasthan &

Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19121/2023; decided on

07.12.2023).

2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute

the fact that the issue, as raised in the present writ petition, is

similar to Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra). However, it is

contended that the petitioners have approached the Court at a

belated stage.

3. Heard and considered.

4. The fact that the issue involved is covered by Division

Bench of this Court in case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra)

remains undisputed. The contention that the petitioner has

approached the Court with a little delay is of no relevancy in the

facts and circumstances as matters of salary and pension have a

recurring cause of action, as was held by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in Rushibhai Jagdishbhai Pathak vs. Bhavnagar

Municipal Corporation: 2022 (4) SLR 862 (SC).

5. In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Di-

vision Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders

passed in Union of India & Ors. vs. Manohar Lal & Ors. (D.B.

Civil Writ Petition No.5445/2022; decided on 07.08.2023) &

the Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. vs.

Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.4139/2022) as well as judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court

in the case of The Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. vs.

C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC OnlineSC 401 has

passed the following directions:-

[2024:RJ-JP:6800] (3 of 3) [CW-18961/2023]

"It is also brought to the notice of this Court that

Special Leave Petition (C) No.3420/2023 and Special

Leave Petition (C) No.1001/2023 have also been dis-

posed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of orders dated

11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon'ble

Supreme Court have also been placed on record.

Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off

on the same terms with direction to the respondents

to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass ap-

propriate orders and other consequential benefits as

per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found

payable be also released within a period of one month.

Accordingly, the present petitions are dis-posed of."

6. In view of the joint statement of the learned counsel for

the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this

writ petition on the same terms and with direction to the

respondents to consider the petitioners' claim and pass

appropriate orders in the light of the Division Bench judgment, as

referred to above, within a period of two months.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

Pooja /61

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter