Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5318 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:34284]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1683/2024
1. Smt. Nandini Daughter Of Late Shri Rohit Kumar Lodha,
Wife Of Shri Amit Mahor, Aged About 23 Years, Resident
Of E-67, Majdoor Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, At Present
Resident Of La 620, Sector 29, Pratap Apartment, Pratap
Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Amit Mahor Son Of Shri Yadram, Aged About 30 Years,
Resident Of D-16, Majdoor Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, At
Present Resident Of La 620, Sector 29, Pratap Apartment,
Pratap Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal
Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Dy. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur East, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. S.H.O. Police Station Patap Nagar, District Jaipur East
(Raj.)
5. Sita Devi Wife Of Late Shri Vijay Lodha, Aged About 62
Years, Resident Of E-67, Majdoor Nagar, Ajmer Road,
Jaipur (Raj.)
6. Jagveer Singh Son Of Shri Kanchand Singh, Aged About
48 Years, Resident Of Vaishno Devi Nagar, Shilp Colony,
Near Ameriya Computer Centre, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Chitra Singh Wife Of Jagveer Singh, Aged About 45 Years,
Resident Of Vaishno Devi Nagar, Shilp Colony, Near
Ameriya Computer Centre, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.)
8. Surgyan Singh Son Of Unknown, Aged About 52 Years,
Resident Of D-88, Majdoor Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
13/08/2024
1. Heard and considered.
2. Vide the judgment dated 02.08.2024 in S.B. Criminal Writ
Petition No. 792/2024 titled as Suman Meena & Anr. Vs.
[2024:RJ-JP:34284] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1683/2024]
State of Rajasthan & Ors., this Court issued directions
specifying the mechanisms/remedies which may be invoked by the
person(s) who seek the implementation of measures to ensure
their safety, on account of extra-legal threats to their lives or
liberty from other social actors or groups. Therefore, the matter is
no longer res integra, and is squarely covered by the directions of
this Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra).
3. This Court observes that in the present case, the
petitioner(s) has/have failed to comply with the directions of this
Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra). Further, the
Registry has failed to ensure that the petition includes due
pleadings and a footnote disclosing the details which indicate that
the alternative efficacious remedies have already been availed of
in accordance with the directions of this Court in Suman Meena
(supra).
4. Accordingly, in terms of the judgment pronounced in Suman
Meena (supra), the instant petition is disposed of. Pending
applications, if any, stand disposed of.
5. A copy of this order be sent to the Registrar (Judicial) to
ensure compliance with the directions issued by this Court in
Suman Meena (supra) regarding the contents of the petitions
wherein directions are sought pertaining to protection.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/9
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!