Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Laxmi Badhala Animal Husbandry ... vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 5278 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5278 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 May, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Laxmi Badhala Animal Husbandry ... vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 25 May, 2023
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
[2023/RJJD/017341]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6156/2023

Laxmi Badhala Animal Husbandry College, Address N. H. 52,
Govindgarh, Jaipur (Raj.) Running By Society Of Late Kumari
Laxmi Badhala Education And Research Institute, N.h. 52,
Govindgarh, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Its Secretary Bajrang Singh
S/o Shri Gangu Ram Jat, Age 59 Years, R/o N.h. 52, Govindgarh,
Jaipur (Raj.).
                                                                         ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Government
         Of Rajasthan, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Jaipur.
2.       The Director, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Jaipur.
3.       Rajasthan University Of Veterinary And Animal Sciences,
         Bikaner, Through Its Registrar.
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :    Mr.Awar Dan Ujjwal
For Respondent(s)              :



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                         Order

25/05/2023

1.    Learned        counsel       for   the    petitioner          submits   that   the

controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been

decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of

Professor S Karan Shiksha Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan &

Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.24692/2018 decided on

09.04.2019).

2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the

issue involved in this writ petition is no more res-integra in view of

the adjudication by a Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in the



                        (Downloaded on 26/05/2023 at 10:16:11 PM)
 [2023/RJJD/017341]                       (2 of 3)                         [CW-6156/2023]



case of Islamic Academy of Education Versus State of

Karnataka: 2003 (6) SCC 679, which reads thus:


     "25.     Privately        managed          educational          institutions
     imparting professional education in the fields of (33)
     medicine, dentistry and engineering have spurted in the
     last few decades. The right of the minorities to establish
     an institution of their own choice in terms of clause(1)
     of Article 30 of the Constitution of India is recognized;
     so is the right of a citizen who intends to establish an
     institution under Article 19 (1) (g) thereof. However,
     the fundamental right of a citizen to establish an
     educational institution and in particular a professional
     institution is not absolute. These rights are subject to
     regulations and laws imposing reasonable restrictions.
     Such reasonable restriction in public interest can be
     imposed under Clause (6) of Article 19 and regulations
     under Article 30 of the Constitution of India. The right
     to     establish     an    educational          institution,      although
     guaranteed         under    the     Constitution,         recognition    of
     affiliation is not. Recognition or affiliation of professional
     institution must be in terms of statute."

3.    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

will file a detailed representation before the respondents within a

period of fifteen days from today and the respondents may be

directed to consider his representation in the light of the judgment

passed by the Co-ordinate Bench at Jaipur in case of Professor S

Karan Shiksha Samiti (supra).

4.        In view of submissions made by the counsel for the

petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing

the respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner in

accordance with law preferably within a period of two months from

                         (Downloaded on 26/05/2023 at 10:16:11 PM)
                                    [2023/RJJD/017341]                   (3 of 3)                    [CW-6156/2023]



                                   the date of receiving representation alongwith certified copy of

                                   this order.

                                   5.    The order has been passed based on the submissions made

                                   in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

                                   veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

                                   the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner

                                   would be entitled to the relief.

                                   6.    All pending applications also stand disposed of.



                                                                 (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

87-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter