Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mithu Singh vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 4861 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4861 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 May, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mithu Singh vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 18 May, 2023
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg

[2023/RJJD/015961] (1 of 3) [CRLW-208/2023]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 208/2023

Mithu Singh S/o Shri Laxman Singh, Aged About 34 Years, B/c Rajput, R/o Charpotiya, P.s. Bhadesar, Dist. Chittorgarh. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur) Through His Wife Smt. Rinku Kanwar W/o Sh. Mithu Singh, Aged About 32 Years, B/c Rajput, R/o Charpotiya, P.s. Bhadesar, Dist. Chittorgarh.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Dist. Collector, Cum Magistrate, Udaipur.

3. The Superintendent Central Jail, Udaipur.

                                                                        ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Ms. Laxmi Devi
For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. Anil Joshi, GA-cum-AAG assisted
                                     by Mr. Pallav Sharma



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

                                          Order

18/05/2023

1. Petitioner has preferred this criminal writ petition (parole) for

seeking second regular parole for a period of thirty days.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that parole has been

rejected by the District Magistrate, Udaipur on the ground that

according to Rule 16(2)(a) of Rajasthan Prisoners (Release on

Parole) Rules, 2021, the petitioner is not entitled for grant of

parole as he was convicted for offence under Sections 3/4 & 7/8 of

POCSO Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that since the Rules

of 2021 have come in force after conviction of the petitioner,

therefore, while considering the case of the petitioner for parole,

[2023/RJJD/015961] (2 of 3) [CRLW-208/2023]

the Rules, which were prevalent on the date of conviction, would

be applied. In support of her contention, counsel has relied upon

the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hitesh

@ Bavko Shivshankar Dave Vs. State of Gujarat, Writ

Petition (Criminal) No.467/2022, decided on 24.01.2023.

Therefore, it is submitted that petitioner would be governed by the

earlier Rajasthan Prisoners (Release on Parole) Rules, 1958.

3. Learned AAG has opposed the second regular parole.

However, it is contended that the petitioner can move a fresh

application before the concerned Authorities.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. In Hitesh @ Bavko Shivshankar Dave (supra), the Apex

Court was dealing with a matter of shortening of sentence. Apex

Court observed that in determining the entitlement of a convict for

premature release, the policy of the State Government on the

date of the conviction would have to be the determinative factor.

However, if the policy which was prevalent on the date of the

conviction is subsequently liberalised to provide more beneficial

terms, those should also be borne in mind.

6. In view of judgment of Hitesh @ Bavko Shivshankar Dave

(supra), Rajasthan Prisoners (Release on Parole) Rules, 1958

would apply with regard to parole of petitioner, hence, this Court

deems it proper to quash and set aside the order dated

17.01.2023 and direct the Authorities to release the petitioner on

second regular parole.

7. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) is accordingly, allowed. The

order rejecting the application for second parole of 30 days dated

17.01.2023, passed by District Magistrate, Udaipur is quashed.

[2023/RJJD/015961] (3 of 3) [CRLW-208/2023]

The Jail Authorities are directed to release the petitioner on

second regular parole for a period of 30 days on furnishing of his

personal bonds of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the Superintendent Central Jail, Udaipur

on the usual terms and conditions.

8. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Udaipur shall be at liberty

to impose other adequate and reasonable conditions to ensure

return of the convict to the custody after availing the parole. The

period of parole shall commence from the date of his release on

parole.

9. The petitioner shall maintain peace and tranquility during parole

period.

10. In case of failure to surrender by stipulated date, the Jail

Authorities shall proceed in accordance with Law.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 126-MS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter