Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4495 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2023
[2023/RJJD/014656]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11399/2019
1. Sunil Kumar S/o Late Shri Banshidhar Verma, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Krishni Mandi Road, Merta City, District Nagaur.
2. Rakesh Kumar S/o Late Shri Banshidhar Verma, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Krishi Mandi Road, Merta City, District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To The Government, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariate, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Director, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Sawasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.
3. Additional Director (Admn.), Department Of Medical And Health Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.
4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nagaur.
5. Joint Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Ajmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Bohra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Ranka for Ms. Vandana Bhansali
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
11/05/2023
1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue
involved in the present petition, regarding correct fixation in the
pay-scale upon completion of 18 and 27 years of service and
consequential re-fixation of pension, gratuity and other retiral
benefits, is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in D.B.
[2023/RJJD/014656] (2 of 3) [CW-11399/2019]
Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.1068/2014 (Govind Dan
Charan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.), decided on
17.12.2015, along with a batch of similar Special Appeals, with
following directions-
"In view of the above discussion, the appeals filed by the appellants are allowed. The order dated 15.04.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in all the writ petitions is set aside, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners-appellants are allowed to the extent that the appellants would be entitled to selection grade and get fixation in the pay-scale of Rs.975-1720, 1200-
2050 and 1640-2900 (5500-9000) on completion of 9, 18 and 27 years of service respectively in terms of judgment in the case of Jagdish Narain Chaturvedi (supra), i.e. from the date of regular appointment. The required exercise would be completed by the respondents within a period of three months from the date of this judgment."
2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed
of with the direction to the petitioners to file a representation
along with certificate copy of the order instant, indicating therein
the pay-scale to which the petitioners - Sunil Kumar and Rakesh
Kumar entitled.
3. On receipt of the representation, the respondents shall
consider the same in accordance with law including the Division
Bench judgment in the case of Govind Dan Charan (supra).
Needful be done within a period of eight weeks of receiving the
representation.
4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
representation has been issued only with a view to ensure
expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not
[2023/RJJD/014656] (3 of 3) [CW-11399/2019]
be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a
particular manner.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 60-akansha/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!