Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3974 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 May, 2023
[2023/RJJD/013455]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 474/2023
Kalu Ram @ Kalu Singh S/o Pratap Singh Rajput, Aged About 28 Years, W.no. 08, Rawatsar, Teh. Rawatsar, Dist. Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.C. Joshi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
03/05/2023
1. By way of filing of the instant miscellaneous petition,
challenge has been made to the order dated 10.04.2023 passed
by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadra, District
Hanumangarh in Criminal Misc. Case No.22/2023 pertaining to FIR
No.482/2022 registered at the Police Station Bhadra, District
Hanumangarh, whereby the prayer made by the petitioner for
releasing the vehicle in question (Bolero) bearing registration No.
RJ-12-U-8346, has been declined.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
is the owner of the vehicle in question which has been seized by
the Police Officers. He submits that the petitioner being the owner
of the vehicle in question, is the person best entitled to get back
the possession of the seized property. There is no other person
claiming supurdagi of the same.
[2023/RJJD/013455] (2 of 2) [CRLR-474/2023]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the criminal revision
petition.
4. Considering the submissions and following the judgment
rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in
AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order dated 18.11.2022 passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 2005/2022 [SLP
(Crl.) No.7280/2022) titled as Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala
& Anr., wherein, the vehicle involved in a crime under NDPS Act
was directed to be released on terms and conditions to be
determined by the Special Court, the revision petition is allowed
and this Court deems it just and appropriate to release the vehicle
in question in favour of the petitioner on interim custody till
conclusion of the trial provided he furnishes a Supurdaginama of
Rs. 3,00,000/- and surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the
Court below.
(FARJAND ALI),J 184-Pramod/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!