Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3926 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2023
[2023/RJJD/013031]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 393/2018
Vijay Prop. Azad Enterprises, Aged About 50 Years, Near Char Bhuja Talkies, Inside Sojati Gate , Jodhpur (Raj)
----Appellant Versus Dinesh Sundesha, Prop. Kamlesh Machinary And Electricals , Panchayat Samiti , Near State Bank Of India Nakoda Road, Balotra, Jodhpur (Raj)
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Dr. Jaya Dadhich, through VC For Respondent(s) : -
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
02/05/2023
1. Upon perusal of the judgment impugned, it is revealing that
a cheque was allegedly given by the accused-respondent to the
petitioner, which upon presentation got dishonoured owing to
reason "Opening Balance Insufficient" in the account of the
accused. There appears reasonable grounds to allow the petitioner
to prefer an appeal against the impugned judgment.
2. Accordingly, the instant application seeking leave to appeal is
allowed. The memo of leave to appeal application shall be treated
and registered as an appeal.
3. Office to proceed.
(FARJAND ALI),J 56-Pramod/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!