Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 566 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 9025/2022
Sunny Kumar Kumat S/o Prakash Chandra Kumat, Aged About
36 Years, 203 A-1 Neelkanth Regent Pantnagar Ghatkopar (East)
Mumbai Maharashtra
----Petitioner
Versus
Monika W/o Sunny Kumar Kumat D/o Naval Singh Mehta,
Kapasan Road Railmagra Dist. Rajsamand Raj.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 9015/2022
Sunny Kumar Kumat S/o Prakash Chandra Kumat, Aged About
36 Years, R/o 203, A-1 Neelkanth Regent, Pantnagar, Ghatkopar
(East), Mumbai (Maharashtra)
----Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Monika W/o Sunny Kumar Kumat, D/o Naval Singh Mehta,
Presently Residing At Kapasan Road, Railmagra, District
Rajsamand (Raj.)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Mandawat for
Mr. Deelip Kawadia
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudhir Saruparia
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
13/01/2023
The petitioner has preferred this misc. petition under Section
482 Cr. P.C., for the following relief :
"It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this
criminal misc. petition may kindly be allowed and the
orders impugned dated 22.11.2022 & 04.12.2021
(Downloaded on 19/01/2023 at 08:46:56 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-9025/2022]
passed by the learned courts below may kindly be
quashed and set aside and the application under
Section 12 of the DV Act filed by the respondent may
kindly be dismissed."
Counsel for the petitioner has tried to make out a case from
salary slip that the respondent-wife is not entitled to get
maintenance of Rs.25,000/- per month and the quantification of
amount based on income tax-return of 2020-21 and granting
maintenance from the date of application, which dates back to
year 2015, is erroneous.
Counsel for the respondent has relied upon judgment of
Hon`ble Apex Court in the matter Rajnesh Vs. Neha & Anr.,
AIR 2021 SC 569 to substantiate his argument that even if the
wife is earning, then too, she is entitled for maintenance in
accordance with the common standard of living.
This Court after examining record of case including the
impugned order and the submissions made is of the view that the
there is no infirmity in the order impugned as now it is settled that
maintenance in all cases will be awarded from the date of filing
the application for maintenance.
No case for interference is made out. The misc. petition is
dismissed.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
125-126 Sanjay/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!