Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 312 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 3/2023
In
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 663/2015
1. Vijay Kumar Sharma S/o Late Sh. Sita Ram Sharma, Aged
About 63 Years, R/o 3/551, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur-302017.
2. Sh. Om Prakash Pushp S/o Late Sh. Ramjilal, Aged About 68
Years, R/o 12/503, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur-17.
3. Smt. Kusum Mathur W/o Virendra Mathur, Aged About 67
Years, R/o 179, Shivaji Nagar, Boring Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur.
4. Late Sh. Anil Kumar Raj S/o Late Sh. Nathu Lal, Aged About
63 Years, Through Legal Heir Wife Smt. Sharda Devi W/o Late
Sh. Anil Kumar Raj C-46, Prem Colony, Surya Nagar, Taraon Ki
Kunt, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
5. Badri Narain Kumawat S/o Late Sh. Bohanri Lal, Aged About
71 Years, D-6, Narayan Sarovar, Muhana Road, Near
Mohanpura Balaji, Mansarovar, Jaipur-20.
6. Sh. Rajendra Kumar Saini S/o Sh. Banshi Lal Saini, Aged
About 57 Years, Resident Of 33, Shree Ram Colony, Ram
Nagar Sodala, Jaipur.
7. Smt. Geeta Yadav W/o Late Sh. Ram Kumar Yadav, Aged
About 63 Years, Resident Of D-69, Siwar Area, Bapu Nagar,
Jaipur.
8. Sh. Pramod Kumar Singh S/o Late Sh. Sita Ram Singh, Aged
About 45 Years, Resident Of 202, Sita Ram Nagar, Near Triveni
Nagar, Gopal Pura, Jaipur.
9. Smt. Usha Kiran Arora W/o Late Sh. Chandra Prakash Arora,
Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of 32/436, Pratap Nagar,
Jaipur.
10. Sh. Nanag Ram Meena Sh. Kanha Ram Meena, Aged About 56
Years, Village Dhamsya Lamba Ki Dhani, Tehsil Jamwa
Ramgarh, Dist- Jaipur.
11. Late Sh. Mohan Lal Meena S/o Late Sh. Nathu Lal Meena,
Aged About 54 Years, Through Legal Heirs Wife Smt. Kamla
Devi Meena W/o Late Sh. Mohan Lal Meena, W/o Village
Dhamsya, Cholawa Ki Dhani, Tehsil Jamwa Ramgarh, Dist-
Jaipur.
12. Late Sh. Lal Chand Meena S/o Late Sh. Nathu Lal Meena, Aged
About 67 Years, Through Its Legal Heir Wife Smt. Prem Deiv
Meena W/o Late Sh. Lal Chand Meena W/o Village Dhamsya,
Cholawa Ki Dhani, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, Dist. Jaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Bhawani Singh Detha, Secretary To The Govt. Department of
Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
(Downloaded on 12/01/2023 at 12:11:31 AM)
(2 of 3) [CCP-3/2023]
2. Sh. Sushil Sharma, Commissioner And Secretary, College
Education, Rajasthan, Shiksha Sankul, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur.
3. Shri Vimal Kumar Bhatia, Secretary, Prabndh Samiti, Kanoria
PG Mahavidhalya, Gandhi Circle, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur.
4. State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Higher Education,
Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atul Saxena, Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Judgment / Order
10/01/2023
Heard.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and going
through the background of the case in which various orders came to be
passed by this Court as also a detailed common order passed by this
Court on 01.12.2021 in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 740/2016 and
batch of contempt petitions arising out of the similar issue, at present,
instead of initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents, we
are inclined to dispose off this contempt petition also on the similar
lines as the order passed on 01.12.2021 in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition
No. 740/2016 and batch of contempt petitions with following
directions:-
1. It shall be an obligation on the part of the Commissioner, College
Education to immediately release the dues payable to the petitioners as
per the directions issued by this Court from time to time and the
directions which have already been issued by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court on 09.09.2021 in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus Manju
Saxena & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 13791/2019, wherein,
(3 of 3) [CCP-3/2023]
the Hon'ble Supreme Court had directed compliance to be made within
a period of eight weeks.
2. A brief, but clear order regarding compliance of the order in
respect of each of the contempt petitioners will have to be passed by
the concerned Directorate within a period of ten weeks from today.
3. The orders in respect of each of the contempt petitioners, which
are required to be passed clearly stating compliance of the order, shall
be reported directly to the Registry of this Court, which shall be placed
before this Court under a separate registered case.
4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt
petition, at this stage, is disposed off, however, with liberty to revive, if
any grievance still remains unredressed.
We must make it absolutely clear that if ultimately we find that
despite the order, the benefits, which the petitioners were entitle to,
have not been released, this Court may take a very serious view of the
matter and erring officials will have to be proceeded against strictly in
accordance with law resulting in all serious consequences, which the
case may deserve.
All the authorities including the Secretariat of the Department of
Higher Education as also the private school education officials shall be
under an obligation to provide necessary information, if any, demanded
by Commissionerate of College Education, towards compliance of the
order of the Court. Non-cooperation shall be treated as an act of over
reaching the order of the Court.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J
Mohita /3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!