Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajasthan Rajya Matralayik ... vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1728 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1728 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Rajasthan Rajya Matralayik ... vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 7 February, 2023
Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Anil Kumar Upman
    [2023/RJJP/002013]

          HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                      BENCH AT JAIPUR

                       D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8727/2021

     Rajasthan Rajya Matralayik Karmchari Mahasangh, Head
     Office RTO, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur Through Its President Raj
     Singh Choudhary S/o Shri Nathu Singh Choudhary, Aged
     About 50 Years, R/o Plot No.2, Dhaka Nagar, Sirsi Road,
     Jaipur.
                                                                             ----Petitioner
                                             Versus
     1.        State     Of      Rajasthan,          Through         Chief      Secretary,
               Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
     2.        State    Of     Rajasthan,         Through        Principle      Secretary,
               Department Of Personnel And Training, Government Of
               Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
     3.        State    Of     Rajasthan,         Through        Principle      Secretary,
               Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan,
               Government Secretariat Jaipur.
                                                                          ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : None

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Judgment / Order

07/02/2023

None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, even in

the second round.

The case was earlier listed before this Court on various

dates namely 13.12.2021, 17.01.2022 and 14.02.2022.

In none of the dates, any appearance was made. Today

also no-one appears. Therefore, we are constrained to observe

that the petitioner is not willing to prosecute this petition.

[2023/RJJP/002013] (2 of 2) [CW-8727/2021]

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of

prosecution.

Interim order also stands vacated.

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ

Mohita /47

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter