Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Chetan Prakash vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 14 February, 2023

Bench: Arun Bhansali

[2023/RJJD/005379]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2479/2023

1. Chetan Prakash S/o Shri Babu Lal Meena, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Post Natata Dhani, Guglaya Ki Tehsil, Jamwaramgarh, Distt. Jaipur, Belt No. 954,working In Hanumangarh District.

2. Pawan Kumar S/o Shri Mahaveer, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No.5, Vpo Fatehgarh, Tehsil And Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 1011 Working In Hanumangarh District

3. Manpreet Singh S/o Shri Veer Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No.1, Vpo Bolavavali, Tehsil Sangariya, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 952, Working In Hanumangarh District

4. Kedarmal S/o Shri Babu Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Villagesamred Khurd, Post Office Samred Kaltan, Tehsil Jamramgarh, Distt. Jaipur, Belt No. 953, Working In Hanumangarh District

5. Ravi Singh S/o Shri Ram Pratap Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Najad Bharat Aata Chakki, Sureshiya, Tehsil And Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 221, Working In Hanumangarh District

6. Ramhari Meena S/o Shri Kedar Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Post Manokhar, Tehsil Kathumar, Distt. Alwar, Belt No. 243, Working In Hanumangarh District

7. Satpal S/o Shri Joraram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Vpo Badbirana, Tehsil Nohar, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 251, Working In Hanumangarh District

8. Kashmeer Singh S/o Shri Sohan Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Khara Kheda, Tehsil Tibbi, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 257, Working In Hanumangarh District

9. Kamlesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Lal Chand Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Budthal, Tehsil Bassi, Distt. Jaipur, Belt No. 265, Working In Hanumangarh District

10. Bharat Lal S/o Shri Badri Narayan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Heerapura, Post Dholaravji, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, Distt. Jaipur, Belt No. 301, Working In Hanumangarh District

11. Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Nathwana, Tehsil Sangariya, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 365, Working In Hanumangarh District

12. Rakesh Kumar S/o Shri Mangal Chand, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Bruj, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, Distt. Jaipur, Belt No. 401, Working In Hanumangarh District

13. Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No.9, Sangriya, Tehsil Sangriya, Distt.

[2023/RJJD/005379] (2 of 5) [CW-2479/2023]

Hanumangarh, Belt No. 456, Working In Hanumangarh District

14. Khemraj Meena S/o Shri Sukhram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Of Ratanpura, Post Nimla, Tehsil Rajgarh, Distt. Alwar, Belt No. 458, Working In Hanumangarh District

15. Jagdish Prasad S/o Shri Sahab Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Jasana, Tehsil Nohar, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 460, Working In Hanumangarh District

16. Jai Prakash Meena S/o Shri Sriram Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dhani Lalgarh, Post Papurna, Tehsil Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu, Belt No. 461, Working In Hanumangarh District

17. Rambabu Meena S/o Shri Kailash Chand, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Jhalatala, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Distt. Alwar, Belt No. 462, Working In Hanumangarh District

18. Mukesh Meena S/o Shri Shankar Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Tamkor Malsisar, Distt. Jhunjhunu, Belt No. 463, Working In Hanumangarh District

19. Mohan Singh S/o Shri Sedu Ram Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kerwara, Post Haldina, Tehsil Malakhera, Distt. Alwar, Belt No. 506, Working In Hanumangarh District

20. Kaluram S/o Shri Birdhi Chand Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Himmatpura, Tehsil Bassi, Distt. Jaipur, Belt No. 539, Working In Hanumangarh District

21. Agraj Meena S/o Shri Kailash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Quarter No. 63, Police Line, Hanumangarh, Belt No. 560, Working In Hanumangarh District

22. Jai Narayan Meena S/o Shri Kailash Chand Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Hajipur, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Distt. Alwar, Belt No. 568, Working In Hanumangarh District

23. Baldev Kumar S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 31 Years, R/o F 15, Pwd, Hanumangarh Junction, Belt No. 569, Working In Hanumangarh District

24. Hansraj Meena S/o Shri Ram Khiladi Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dhani Balkishan Post Palunda, Tehsil Lalsot, Distt. Dausa, Belt No. 610, Working In Hanumangarh District

25. Sukhveer Kumar S/o Shri Harchand Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Sahjipura, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 630, Working In Hanumangarh District

26. Om Prakash Meena S/o Shri Chotu Ram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Khori, P)Ost Office Baskho, Tehsil Bassi, Distt. Jaipur, Belt No. 636, Working In Hanumangarh District

27. Jitendrakumar Meena S/o Shri Ram Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Fatehganj, Post Rooppura, Tehsil Uniyara, Distt. Tonk, Belt No. 642, Working In Hanumangarh District

[2023/RJJD/005379] (3 of 5) [CW-2479/2023]

28. Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Prahlad Rai, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kalsiya, Tehsil Nawalgarh, Distt. Jhunjhunu, Belt No. 687, Working In Hanumangarh District

29. Tek Chand S/o Shri Kehri Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/ o Salempur, P.o. Noorpur, Tehsil Kathumar, Distt. Alwar, Belt No. 920, Working In Hanumangarh District

30. Rajendra Prasad S/o Shri Ganpat Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Bhama Ki Dhani, Post Office Khachariyawas, Distt. Sikar, Belt No. 939, Working In Hanumangarh District

31. Vikram Singh S/o Shri Ram Karam Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kkothin, P.o. Bejupada, Tehsil Bejupada, Distt. Dausa, Belt No. 941, Working In Hanumangarh District

32. Ajeet Kumar S/o Shri Brij Lal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Gothda, P).o. Dalpura, Tehsil Nadoti, Distt. Karauli, Belt No. 942, Working In Hanumangarh District

33. Rajeev S/o Shri Kaluram Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/ o Village Seera Ki Dhani, Vpo Toda Bhata, Tehsil Bassi, Distt. Jaipur, Belt No. 943, Working In Hanumangarh District

34. Suman D/o . Shri Subhash Chand Vishnoi, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Mainawali, Tehsil Hanumangarh, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 944, Working In Hanumangarh District

35. Ramavtar S/o Shri Dhudaram Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Bihar, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar, Belt No. 945, Working In Hanumangarh District

36. Baskala D/o . Shri Mahipal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Malkheda, Tehsil Bhadra, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 946, Working In Hanumangarh District

37. Rekha Bai D/o Shri Manohar Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/ o Kherwada, Po Haldina, Tehsil Alwar, Belt No. 947, Working In Hanumangarh District

38. Meera Bai Meena W/o Shri Bhawani Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Rajpur, Post Office Badoda Kan, Tehsil Kathumar, Distt. Alwar, Belt No. 948, Working In Hanumangarh District

39. Krishna Bai Meena D/o . Shri Kailash Chandra Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Alwar Police Line, Alwar, Belt No. 949, Working In Hanumangarh District

40. Sarita Kumar D/o Shri Indraj, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 9 Vpo Meharwala, Tehsil Tibbi, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 950, Working In Hanumangarh District

41. Sunita D/o . Shri Bheemsain, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Talwara Jheel, Tehsil Tibbi, Distt. Hanumangarh, Belt No. 951, Working In Hanumangarh District

----Petitioners

[2023/RJJD/005379] (4 of 5) [CW-2479/2023]

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Home Secretary, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur.

3. Inspector General Of Police, Bikaner Range, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

4. The Superintendent Of Police, Hanumanarh.

                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. Achla Ram.
For Respondent(s)          :



             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

                                     Order

14/02/2023

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the

issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the

judgment in Dara Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil

Writ Petition No.11973/2012 decided on 17.12.2012.

In the case of Dara Singh (supra), a coordinate Bench of this

Court, inter-alia, directed as under:-

"Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that realizing the mistake, appointment has been given, thus, grievance of petitioner to that extent is redressed, but appointment should have been made effective from the date candidates lesser in merit were given appointment with notional benefits.

In view of the prayer made and taking note of the order dated 13.12.2012 whereby petitioner is given appointment realizing mistake by the respondents, I consider it proper to direct that aforesaid appointment should be treated from the date when lesser meritorious candidates were given. The petitioner would, accordingly, be entitled to the notional benefits and seniority from the date persons with less merit were given appointment. The actual benefits would be allowed from the date of joining pursuant to the order dated 13.12.2012.

[2023/RJJD/005379] (5 of 5) [CW-2479/2023]

With the aforesaid, writ petition stands disposed of."

In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by

the petitioners is disposed of with similar directions as given in the

case of Dara Singh (supra).

The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners would be entitled to the relief.