Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sidney Vincent S/O Shri ... vs Shri Kenith David S/O Shri E. David ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1364 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1364 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Sidney Vincent S/O Shri ... vs Shri Kenith David S/O Shri E. David ... on 2 February, 2023
Bench: Inderjeet Singh
[2023/RJJP/001304]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1960/2023

1.       Sidney Vincent S/o Shri Vailington (Since Deceased),
         Through Lrs-
2.       Smt. Ida P. Lawrance W/o Late Shri Sidney Vincent,
         Resident Of House No. 895A/1 Christianganj, Ajmer.
3.       Dixon Vincent S/o Late Shri Sidney Vincent, Resident Of
         House No. 895A/1 Christianganj, Ajmer.
4.       Regina Vincent D/o Late Shri Sidney Vincent, Resident Of
         House No. 895A/1 Christianganj, Ajmer.
                                                                  ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
Shri Kenith David S/o Shri E. David, Aged About 65 Years,
Resident Of House No. 895A/1 Christianganj, Ajmer.
                                                                 ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Pareek.

For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

Order

02/02/2023

The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners

with the prayer to direct the Rent Tribunal, Ajmer to decide the

eviction petition No.148/2014 expeditiously.

Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition is

pending before the Rent Tribunal, Ajmer since 2014. Counsel

further submits that according to the scheme of Rent Control Act,

2001, the eviction petition has to be decided within a period of

240 days.

In support of contentions, counsel relied upon the judgment

passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Hameed

[2023/RJJP/001304] (2 of 2) [CW-1960/2023]

Kunju vs. Nazimin, reported in (2017) 8 Supreme Court

Cases 611, wherein it has been held as under:-

"43. Before parting, we consider it apposite to observe that the object of the Rent Laws all over the State is to ensure speedy disposal of eviction cases between the landlord and tenant and especially those cases where the landlord seek eviction for his bona fide need.

44. We sincerely feel that the eviction matters should be given priority in their disposal at all stages of litigation and especially where the eviction is claimed on the ground of bona fide need of the landlord. We hope and trust that due attention would be paid by all courts to ensure speedy disposal of eviction cases."

In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of

with a direction to the Rent Tribunal, Ajmer to decide the eviction

petition No.148/2014 preferably within a period of one year.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

MG/136

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter