Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4307 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:19377]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1993/2018
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11166/2018
Shish Pal Singh S/o Late Shri Dhiraram, Aged About 62 Years,
R/o Khichado Ki Dhani Tan Kishanpura Tehsil Dantaramgarh
District Sikar (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Shri Naresh Thakarwal District Collector, Sikar
2. Shri Manoj Kumar Meena Sub Divisional Officer,
Dantaramgarh District Sikar
3. Shri Arvind Singh Kaviya Nayab Tehsildar (Receiver),
Palwasa Tehsil Dantaramgarh District Sikar
4. State Of Rajasthan Through District Collector, Sikar (Raj)
----Respondents-Contemnors
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Takhat Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aksay Sharma, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
25/08/2023
This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful
disobedience of the interim order dated 22.05.2018 passed by this
Court whereby, SDO Dantaramgarh was directed to ensure that no
encroachment is made on the land of Khasra nos. 457, 458, 460,
461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 489, & 9519 situated in
Village Khichado Ki Dhani, Tan Kishanpura, Tehsil Dantaramgarh,
District Sikar.
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted a Fard
Mauka Report dated 19.08.2023 prepared by the Nayab Tehsildar,
[2023:RJ-JP:19377] (2 of 2) [CCP-1993/2018]
Palsana which reveals that except residential construction on 0.05
hectare of land, the entire land is lying vacant and there is no
encroachment. He submits that the aforesaid house was existing
even on 19.04.2010 when an order under Section 146 Cr.P.C. was
passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Dantaramgarh, District
Sikar and no encroachment has been made on the subject land
after passing of the interim order dated 22.05.2018. He,
therefore, prays for dismissal of the contempt petition.
Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
since no residential house was existing prior to order dated
22.05.2018, the respondents may be directed to purge the
contempt and they may also be punished suitably.
Heard. Considered.
As per the order dated 19.04.2010, the residential house on
0.05 hectare of land was already existing before the order dated
22.05.2018 was passed.
In view of the Fard Mauka Report dated 19.08.2023
furnished by the Nayab Tehsildar Palsana, this Court is satisfied
that there has been substantial compliance of the interim order
dated 22.05.2018.
In view thereof, this contempt petition is dismissed.
Notices are discharged.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Sudha /46
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!