Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3639 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:18040]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26158/2018
Budhram S/o Malaram Saini, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Moti
Singh Ki Dhani, Ward No 41, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Managing Director, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited,
Ajmer, Rajasthan.
2. Superintending Engineer, Jhunjhunu Circle, Ajmer Vidyut
Vitran Nigam Ltd, Distt- Jhunjhunu.
3. Assistant Engineer, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd,
Jhunjhunu, Distt- Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohitash Kumar Saini for Ms. Kamlesh Kumari For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
17/08/2023
1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with
the prayer that the respondents may be directed to disconnect the
illegal electricity connection taken on the land Khasra No.1870 of
the petitioner.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that one Vinod Kumar has
taken electricity supply connection at his Hotel, Sara Palace,
Agrasen Circle, Jhunjhunu. Counsel further submits that an Officer
of the respondents-Corporation Ltd. has already instructed his
subordinates to disconnect the electricity connection in the name
of consumer Vinod Kumar at this Hotel, Sara Palace, Agrasen
Circle, Jhunjhunu.
[2023:RJ-JP:18040] (2 of 2) [CW-26158/2018]
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel appearing for
the petitioner and also perused the pleadings and documents of
the petition.
4. The petitioner is seeking directions to the respondent-
Corporation for disconnecting the electricity supply connection in
the name of consumer- Vinod Kumar at his Hotel, Sara Palace,
Agrasen, Circle, Jhunjhunu, submitting that the electricity
connection in the name of Vinod Kumar is illegal. Counsel for the
petitioner could not point out how the electricity connection in the
name of consumer- Vinod Kumar at his Hotel, Sara Palace,
Agrasen Circle, Jhunjhunu is illegal. The petitioner has also not
impleaded consumer- Vinod Kumar as party respondent against
whom, he is seeking directions.
5. Counsel for the petitioner also could not make out how the
connection issued in the name of Vinod Kumar at his Hotel, Sara
Palace, Agrasen Circle, Jhunjhunu is adversely affecting him.
Merely writing a letter by an Officer to subordinates for
disconnection of supply of electricity of the consumer at his own
property, cannot be ground for disconnection of electricity supply
connection unless it is observed that in this manner the
connection issued to any such consumer is illegal.
6. This Court finds no merits in the present writ petition,
therefore, the present writ petition is dismissed.
7. Since the main petition has been dismissed, all other
pending application/s, if any, also stands dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA /98
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!