Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3379 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3723/2020
1. Surendra Singh Son Of Shri Raghuveer Singh, Aged About
75 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Buhana Bus Stand,
Narnaul Road, Singhana, District Jhunjhunu - At Present
Residing At Shekhsar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu
(Rajasthan).
2. Manish Son Of Shri Surendra Singh, Aged About 35 Years,
By Caste Jat, Resident Of Buhana Bus Stand, Narnaul
Road, Singhana, District Jhunjhunu - At Present Residing
At Shekhsar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
3. Banarsi Devi Wife Of Shri Surendra Singh, Aged About 70
Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Buhana Bus Stand,
Narnaul Road, Singhana, District Jhunjhunu - At Present
Residing At Shekhsar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu
(Rajasthan).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Jai Karan Singh Son Of Shri Raghuveer Singh, Aged About
90 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Singhana, Tehsil
Buhana, District Jhunjhunu - At Present Residing At
Shekhsar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu Through His
Power Of Attorney Satyaveer Singh Son Of Shri Jaikaran
Singh, Aged About 57 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of
Shekhsar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
2. Sunil Kumar Son Of Shri Vijay Singh, Aged About 48
Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Jat Behrod, District Alwar
(Rajasthan) - At Present Residing At Buhana Bus Stand,
Narnaul Moad, Singhana, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
3. Sangita D/o Shri Surendra Singh And Wife Of Sunil
Kumar, Aged About 45 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of
Jat Behrod, District Alwar (Rajasthan) - At Present
Residing At Buhana Bus Stand, Narnaul Moad, Singhana,
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
4. Kusumlata Wife Of Shri Pardeep Kumar, Aged About 40
Years, By Caste Mahajan, Resident Of Ward No. 11,
Gothra, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
(2 of 2) [CW-3723/2020]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saransh Saini
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nathu Singh Chauhan
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
10/08/2023
This writ petition arises out of the orders passed on the
application for temporary injunction.
Counsel for the respondents submits that the original suit
has been dismissed.
Counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to accept this
statement made by counsel for the respondents.
In view of the statement made by counsel for the
respondents, this writ petition has been infructuous.
Hence, the civil writ petition is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Seema/11
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!