Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Devi Lal vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 2868 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2868 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Devi Lal vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 10 April, 2023
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

[2023/RJJD/009400]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12128/2018

1. Devi Lal S/o Shri Roshan Lal Harijan, Aged About 32 Years, Behind Cmho Office, Rajnagar, District Rajsamand (Raj.). And

2. Seema W/o Shri Vinod Kumar Harijan,, Aged About 32 Years, Shastri Nagar, Deogarh, District Rajsamand (Raj.)

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariate, Jaipur, District Jaipur (Raj.), And

2. The Municipal Council, Rajsamand Through The Commissioner, Municipal Council, Rajsamand, District Rajsamand (Raj.).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chaitanya Kumar Gehlot For Respondent(s) : None present

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

10/04/2023

1. Mr. Gehlot, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks

permission to withdraw the present petition in light of the

directions given by the Division Bench of this Court vide its order

dated 09.08.2019 rendered in DB Special Appeal

No.1733/2018 : Virendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Anr.

2. Permission granted.

3. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. The petitioners would be free to file a representation before

the respondents within a period of two weeks from today.

5. In case, the representation is so addressed along with a

certified copy of the order instant, the respondents shall consider

[2023/RJJD/009400] (2 of 2) [CW-12128/2018]

petitioners' grievance in accordance with law including the

judgment passed by Division Bench in the case of Virendra Kumar

(supra).

6. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

7. The stay application also stands dismissed accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 143-akansha/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter