Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akram Son Of Rujdaar vs Taufiq Khan Son Of Abdul Khan
2022 Latest Caselaw 6768 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6768 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Akram Son Of Rujdaar vs Taufiq Khan Son Of Abdul Khan on 18 October, 2022
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

              S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13158/2022

Akram Son Of Rujdaar
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
Taufiq Khan Son Of Abdul Khan & Ors.
                                                                ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. KK Sharma Sr, Adv. with Mr. MS Raj Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. RK Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gajender Singh Rathore

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

18/10/2022

The matter come up on an application (IA No.1/22) filed by

the petitioner seeking injunction against the direction of the

learned Senior Civil Judge No.1, Tijara, District Alwar in election

petition No.38-09-2020 (CIS No.5/20) vide its judgment dated

25.08.2022 to the extent it declares the respondent no.1/ election

petitioner as returned candidate on the post of Sarpanch, Gram

Panchayat, Palpur, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner, relying upon a co-

ordinate bench judgement of this court in the case of Smt.

Ummed Kanwar Vs. Prabhu Singh & Ors.; 2012(4) ALC

(Raj.)14, would submit that in case of multi-cornered contest,

the election petitioner or for that matter, any defeated candidate,

cannot be declared as elected member even if the election petition

is allowed and the returned candidate is held to be disqualified.

He, therefore, submits that direction of the learned Trial Court to

(2 of 2) [CW-13158/2022]

the extent the election petitioner is held to be the elected

Sarpanch, needs to be stayed.

Learned senior counsel for the respondent no.1 opposing the

prayer submits that Rule 87(1)(c) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj

(Election) Rules, 1994 authorizes the court to declare either the

election petitioner or any other defeated candidate as duly

elected. He, therefore, prays for dismissal of the application.

Heard. Considered.

This court in the case of Smt. Ummed (Supra) after

appreciating the provisions of the Rules 83 and 87 of the Rules of

1994 in the light of a constitution judgment of the Hon'ble Apex

Court of India in the case of Vishwanatna Reddy Vs. Konappa

Rudrappa Nadgouda & Anr (AIR 1969 CS 604) and another

judgment in case of Prakash Khandre Vs. Dr. Vijay Kumar

Khandre & Ors. [(2002) 5SCC 568], held that in case of multi-

cornered contest, even if the election petition is allowed, the

election petitioner or any other defeated candidate cannot be

declared as returned candidate.

In view of this indisputable legal position, the application

deserved to be allowed.

The application is allowed accordingly. Direction of the

learned Trial Court in its order dated 25.08.2022 whereby, the

election petitioner has been declared to be the elected Sarpanch

of the Gram Panchayat, Palpur, is stayed, till the disposal of this

writ petition. The consequences to follow.

Stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

List on 22.11.2022 as jointly prayed.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

CHHAYA AWASTHI /301

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter