Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhanwar Singh S/O Late Sh. Anji ... vs The State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 7491 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7491 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Bhanwar Singh S/O Late Sh. Anji ... vs The State Of Rajasthan on 25 November, 2022
Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Vinod Kumar Bharwani
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

           D.B. Civil Writ (PIL) Petition No. 17468/2022

1.     Bhanwar Singh S/o Late Sh. Anji Singh, Aged About 62
       Years, Resident Of Ward No. 11, Village Ladunda, Tehsil
       Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
2.     Mahender Singh S/o Late Sh. Bhan Singh, Aged About 52
       Years, Resident Of Village Ladunda, Tehsil Surajgarh,
       District Jhunjhunu.
3.     Vikram Singh S/o Sh. Prabhu Singh, Aged About 32
       Years, Resident Of Village Ladunda, Tehsil Surajgarh,
       District Jhunjhunu.
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.     The   State     Of       Rajasthan,      Through          District   Collector
       Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu.
2.     The Tehsildar, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
3.     Banne Singh S/o Surjan Singh, Resident Of Village
       Ladunda, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
4.     Harnath Singh S/o Surjan Singh, Resident Of Village
       Ladunda, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
5.     Dharampal Singh S/o Karan Singh, Resident Of Village
       Ladunda, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
6.     Bajrang Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Resident Of Village
       Ladunda, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
7.     Jitendra Singh S/o Ramchandra Singh, Resident Of Village
       Ladunda, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
8.     Hajari Singh S/o Ratan Singh, Resident Of Village
       Ladunda, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
                                                                  ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tapeshwar Pal Singh Parmar, Advocate

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Judgment / Order

(2 of 3) [CW-17468/2022]

25/11/2022

Instant Public Interest Litigation petition has been filed with

the following prayer:-

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your

lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and

allow this petition and call for the entire record of

the case and further pleased to by an appropriate

writ, order or direction:-

a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the

respondent no.1 to 2 may kindly be directed to take

legal action against the respondent no.3 to 8

regarding encroachment at Govt. Land "Gair Mumkin

Johad" in khasra no. 395 at village Ladunda, Tehsil

Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu and further the

direction may be issued to respondents to remove

encroachment over the said govt. land.

b) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in

favour of the petitioner."

A Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Jagdish

Prashad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B.

Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 10819/ 2018 vide order dated

30.01.2019 has directed creation of Public Land Protection Cell

(PLPC) for rural areas in every district.

Counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be

permitted to submit a representation before the PLPC and

respondents be directed to dispose of the same within a period of

two months.

In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed

off, in view of the directions issued by the Division Bench in the

(3 of 3) [CW-17468/2022]

matter of Jagdish Prashad Meena (supra) and the petitioners

are at liberty to make a representation before PLPC and the

respondents are directed to decide the same within a period of

two months.

Considering that this petition has been disposed off at the

motion stage without issuing notice to the respondents, it is made

clear that this Court has not commented upon the merits of the

case, but only directed inquiry on the complaint as per the order

passed in the case of Jagdish Prashad Meena (supra).

It is further directed that in the inquiry for removal of the

encroachment, the persons, who are alleged to be encroachers,

shall be afforded an opportunity of hearing.

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J

Mohita /32

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter