Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Richa Dharu vs Hemant Panwar
2022 Latest Caselaw 7646 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7646 Raj
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Richa Dharu vs Hemant Panwar on 23 May, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
           S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1258/2019

Richa Dharu W/o Hemant Panwar D/o Sh. Dilip Kumar, Aged
About 27 Years, R/o Behind Nagar Parishad, Ward No. 43, Bapu
Colony, Bikaner (Raj.)
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                        Versus
Hemant Panwar S/o Shri Rameshwar Panwar, R/o Near Govt.
Secondary School, Harijan Basti, Ratangarh, Dist. Churu. (Raj.)
                                                                     ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)             :     Mr. Kan Singh Oad
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. Kaushal Gautam with
                                    Mr. Kunal Kalla



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                         Order

23/05/2022

     This Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred claiming

the following reliefs:

     "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this criminal revision
     petition may kindly be allowed and it is therefore, humbly prayed
     that the revision petition may kindly be allowed and order dated
     28.08.2019 passed by the learned Family Court No.2, Bikaner in
     Case No.227/2018 (586/16) titled as Richa Dharu Vs. Hemant
     Panwar, may kindly be quashed and set aside and the application
     filed by the petitioner under Section 125 Cr.P.C. may kindly be
     allowed and accordingly award the amount of maintenance to
     the petitioner Rs.30,000/- per month from the date of filing of

     the application."


     Learned counsel for the petitioner-wife submits that the

respondent-husband is working on the post of Branch Manager in

Bank of Baroda and is earning income of Rs.90,000/- per month.

Learned counsel further submits that the learned court below has


                         (Downloaded on 25/05/2022 at 08:51:35 PM)
                                        (2 of 3)                 [CRLR-1258/2019]



denied the monthly maintenance to the petitioner-wife only on the

ground that the divorce has been allowed between the parties.

Learned counsel also submits that the divorce was ex-parte

claimed by the respondent.

     Learned counsel has relied upon the proviso to Section

125(1) Cr.P.C., the explanation, as per which, the definition of

"wife" includes a woman who has been divorced by, or has

obtained a divorce from, her husband and has not remarried.

     Learned counsel further submits that once the petitioner-wife

has not remarried, is entitled for maintenance and any divorce

petition cannot be construed as it was a voluntary desertion of the

parties. Learned counsel also submits that since there was an

established cruelty, therefore, the marriage derailed, but that does

not mean that the respondent-husband can be absolved from the

liability of maintenance.

     Learned counsel for the respondent-husband vehemently

opposes the submissions on the ground that once the wife has

failed to discharge the duties as a wife and is no more abiding by

the conjugal rights, therefore, the decision arrived at by the

learned court below is justified.

     This Court, after hearing learned counsel for the parties as

well as perusing the record of the case, finds that the learned

court below has come out with a judgment without considering the

definition of wife provided under Section 125(1) Cr.P.C. The

learned court below has gravely erred in denying the maintenance

on the ground of divorce and cruelty. The maintenance is one

thing, which has to be granted and a lady suffering cruelty, cannot

be said to have deserted or voluntarily residing away. The



                    (Downloaded on 25/05/2022 at 08:51:35 PM)
                                                                          (3 of 3)                 [CRLR-1258/2019]



                                   circumstances created by the husband, if not conducive, are

                                   bound to push away the wife.

                                        In view of the above, the present revision petition is allowed.

                                   The impugned order dated 28.08.2019 passed by learned Family

                                   Court No.2, Bikaner in Case No.227/2018 (586/16) (Richa Dharu

                                   Vs. Hemant Panwar) is hereby quashed and it is directed that the

                                   petitioner-wife shall now be entitled to receive the maintenance to

                                   a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month from the respondent-husband

                                   from the date of filing the petition. It is needless to say that any

                                   interim maintenance granted shall be excluded from the amount

                                   so due.

                                        All pending applications stand disposed of. Record of the

                                   learned court below be sent back forthwith.



                                                               (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

117-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter