Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Inderjeet Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 7519 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7519 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 May, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Inderjeet Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 19 May, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                         (1 of 3)                   [CRLAS-670/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 670/2022

Inderjeet Kumar S/o Shri Ramu Ram Choudhary, Aged About 37
Years, R/o Ward No. 16 Santnagar Ps Raniya Dist. Sirsa Haryana
(At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail Hanumangarh)
                                                                     ----Appellant
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       Kumari Gangawati D/o Upendra, B/c Sahani R/o Saifan
         Colony Rathikheda Tibbi Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)           :     Mr. Kuldeep Sharma
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Javed Gauri, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                      Order

19/05/2022

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Issue notice to the respondent No.2 only, as the learned

Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-

State.

     Call for the record.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.422/2022.

     Learned counsel for the appellant makes a statement at Bar

that he has already filed the certificate regarding the temporary

suspension of the bail already made by the learned trial court.

Learned counsel also furnishes a copy of the certificate, the same

is taken on record.




                      (Downloaded on 20/05/2022 at 08:32:02 PM)
                                        (2 of 3)                   [CRLAS-670/2022]


     Learned    Public   Prosecutor         opposes         the   suspension   of

sentence application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant.

     Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.

422/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 30.04.2022 in Session Case No.52/2020 (CIS

No.61/2020) against appellant- Inderjeet Kumar S/o Shri

Ramu Ram Choudhary shall remain suspended till final disposal

of the aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in a

sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

Court on 27.06.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-


     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the
           month of January of every year till the appeal is
           decided.
     2.    That if the appellant changes the place of
           residence, they will give in writing his changed
           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
           in the High Court.
     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
           they will give in writing their changed address to
           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                    (Downloaded on 20/05/2022 at 08:32:02 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-670/2022]



                                   accused appellant do not appear before the trial court, the learned

                                   trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.

                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

168-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter