Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3960 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 19 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 526/2022
State Of Rajasthan & Ors.
----Appellant
Versus
Sita Devi Educational Society and Anr.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prakhar Gupta & Ms. Charvi Patni for Mr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma, AAG For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sara Praveen for Mr. K A Khan
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Judgment / Order
19/05/2022
1. It is contended by counsel for the appellants that going
beyond the prayer claimed by the writ petitioners, the learned
Single Judge has passed the impugned order by which several
directions have been issued. No relief have been claimed as
directed in directions No.2, 3 & 4 of the impugned order.
Directions No.2, 3 & 4 are as under:-
"2. The penalty deposited by the respective
petitioner/college under the orders of the
Court or in the light of the provisions of the
Private Colleges Policy be refunded to the
petitioners/colleges within a period of sixty
days failing which interest @ 6% will accrue
on the same after lapse of 60 days.
3. It is directed that the amount refunded
to the petitioners/colleges by the respondents
in light of the above directions, shall be
(2 of 3) [SAW-526/2022]
deposited by the respective
petitioners/colleges in the "Student Welfare
Fund", and be used for the welfare and
betterment of students in activities like
clearing dues of students who are unable to
deposit fee, medical care, library, and other
amenities and facilities needed for and by the
students and not be used for any other
purpose.
4. The State as well as respondents are
directed to ensure that on account of present
dispute, students should not be made to
suffer and their results, mark-sheets, admit
cards, other documents should not be
withheld and be declared/released in capacity
of regular students forthwith immediately,
without any fall. The respondents are directed
to assist and help the students in question on
24X7 basis. No student should be deprived of
appearance in any future examination or
appearance on account of present dispute as
the petitioners have submitted that the non-
declaration of result is causing prejudice to
the students for appearing in future
examinations including competitive
examinations."
2. Looking to the contentions put forward by counsel for the
appellants and looking to the fact that no such relief was claimed
by the writ petitioners, even then directions No.2, 3 & 4 have been
(3 of 3) [SAW-526/2022]
issued by the learned Single Judge, hence, the matter requires
consideration.
3. Issue notice of the appeal and stay application. Since the
respondents has appeared through caviator, no notice is required
to be served on the respondents and the copy of the appeal has
already been supplied to the counsel for the respondents.
4. In the meantime, operation of the impugned order dated
11.03.2022 shall remained stayed.
5. List this matter along with connected identical matters after
six weeks.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J ARTI SHARMA /4
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!