Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2614 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 404/2019
Ramavtar S/o Shri Ladhuram
----Appellant
Versus
Nathulal S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal & Anr.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
29/03/2022
This second appeal has been filed by appellant-defendant
(hereinafter "defendant), assailing judgment and decree dated
21.08.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.26 in Suit
No.26/2003 where by suit for specific performance and permanent
injunction has been dismissed, which has been affirmed by the
first Appellate Court vide judgment dated 26.07.2019 passed by
Additional District Judge No.19, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur in
Appeal No.10/2013.
Counsel for defendant fairly submits that although with
passage of time, decree for specific performance dated
21.08.2009 has been executed and sale deed has been registered,
however, he submits that since agreement itself was void as
defendant is alleged to be minor at the time of agreement. He also
submits that such agreement is void ab initio and no decree for
specific performance on the basis of such agreement could have
been passed.
Issue notice to respondents.
(2 of 2) [CSA-404/2019]
On request of counsel for defendant, service of notice on
respondent No.2 is dispensed with.
Registry is directed to send reminder to both the Courts
below to send the record to this Court.
In the meanwhile, since defendant admits that impugned
decree has been executed and registered sale deed has been
made in favour of respondent-plaintiff, both parties are directed to
maintain status quo in relation to property in question.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /27
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!