Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 606 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 14/2022
Birdi Chand S/o Late Shri Bhoora Lal Ji Sankhla,
----Petitioner
Versus
Mukti Lal S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal Kumawat and Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta, Advocate through VC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA Order
24/01/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit
is clearly barred by limitation. In this regard findings recorded by
the trial Court that question of limitation is a mixed question of
law and fact is perverse and against the material available on
record. It is submitted that the plaintiff himself executed the sale
deed in question on 18.06.2014, therefore, the suit should have
been filed within three years from the date of the sale deed i.e.
18.06.2014 and, therefore, in view of the Article 59 of the
Limitation Act, the suit is clearly time barred. He has placed
reliance on the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
case of Raghwendra Sharan Singh Versus Ram Prasanna
Singh (dead) by Legal Representatives reported in (2020) 16
SCC 601.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable by
28.02.2022.
Necessary steps be taken within a week.
In the meantime, further proceedings in civil suit No.
21/2021 titled as (Mukti Lal Vs. Birdi Chand and Ors.) pending
(2 of 2) [CR-14/2022]
before the Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 1, Beawar,
District Ajmer, shall remain stayed.
However, this order shall be effective only after service
of notice upon the respondents.
(PRAKASH GUPTA),J
Mohit-12
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!