Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14764 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 880/2022
Deepa Ram S/o Sh. Varada Ji, Aged About 52 Years, Vill. Harji, P.s. Ahore, Dist. Jalore. (Raj.). (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Joshi, GA-cum-AAG
assisted by Mr. Pallav Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
15/12/2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for
suspension of sentence.
The instant application for suspension of sentence has been
preferred by the appellant-applicant, who has been convicted and
sentenced by the learned Sessions Judge, Sirohi, vide judgment
dated 30.08.2022 in Sessions Case No.04/2014. The appellant-
applicant has been sentenced as under :-
Offence U/s Sentence Fine Sentence in default of
payment of fine
302 IPC Life Rs.10,000/- 1 Years' S.I.
Imprisonment
(2 of 4) [SOSA-880/2022]
Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant has submitted that
the trial court has grossly erred in convicting and sentencing the
appellant-applicant vide the impugned judgment. It is argued that
in the complaint filed by the complainant, appellant-applicant was
not named, however, the police has arrested him only on the basis
of doubt.
Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant has submitted
that the trial court has heavily placed reliance on the statements
of Sampat Lal (PW-11), Shanti Lal (PW-12) and Smt. Souram
(PW-16) while concluding that those witnesses have stated that
they have last seen the deceased in the company of the appellant-
applicant. It is further argued that the police has recorded
statements of the above referred witnesses after one month of the
incident. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant has
submitted that though, the police has recovered clothes of the
appellant-applicant and concluded that A Group blood stains were
found on the same, but in the FSL as well as during the course of
investigation, the blood group of the deceased was not detected.
It is further submitted that the prosecution has failed to prove any
motive and, in such circumstances, it is clear that the appellant-
applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further
submitted that the appellant-applicant was on bail during trial and
there is every possibility that the present appeal will not be finally
heard in near future.
Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of
the case and after carefully scrutinizing the record of the case, we
consider it just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence
(3 of 4) [SOSA-880/2022]
awarded to the appellant-applicant.
Accordingly, the application for the Suspension of Sentence
filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the
substantive sentence passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sirohi
vide judgment dated 30.08.2022 in Sessions Case No.04/2014
against appellant-applicant Deepa Ram S/o Sh. Varada Ji shall
remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal,
provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 16 th January,
2023 and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the
appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the appellant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of
the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as
Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-
appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also
be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall
not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to
pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said
(4 of 4) [SOSA-880/2022]
accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the
learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for
cancellation of bail.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J (VIJAY BISHNOI),J 24-Arun/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!