Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Nani Bai @ Nannu Banoo And Anr vs State And Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 10575 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10575 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Smt Nani Bai @ Nannu Banoo And Anr vs State And Anr on 16 August, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1222/2018

1.      Smt. Nani Bai @ Nannu Banoo Wife Of Jassu Khan
2.      Mohideen Khan Son Of Jassu Khan, Both By Caste
        Musalman, Resident Of Rajpura, Tehsil Taranagar, District
        Churu.
                                                                  ----Petitioners
                                   Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan
2.      Smt.     Banoo     Daughter         Of     Yashin       Khan   Wife   Of
        Kayankhani, Railway Colony, Churu.
                                                                ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :   Mr. NL Joshi
For Respondent(s)          :   Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA
                               Mr. Bhawani Singh & Mr. Amit Kumar
                               Purohit for Mr. Chaitanya Gehlot



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

16/08/2022

     This petition has been preferred, laying a challenge to order

passed by learned trial court whereby charges have been framed

against the petitioners.

     At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor, while opposing the

petition, relied upon the judgment of Sanghi Brothers (Indore)

Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Chaudhary & Ors, reported in 2009 Cr. L.J.

338, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that suspicion

about commission of an offence and involvement of the accused

is sufficient to frame charge.

     Taking into consideration narrow scope of interference at this

stage, the overall factual matrix as well as record of the case, no


                    (Downloaded on 16/08/2022 at 08:20:10 PM)
                                                                         (2 of 2)                   [CRLMP-1222/2018]



                                   cause for making any interference is made out. However, the

                                   petitioners shall be at liberty to take up all their legal issues, at

                                   the appropriate stage, before the learned trial court.

                                         The present misc. petition stands disposed of accordingly. All

                                   pending applications also stand disposed of.



                                                                (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

78-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter