Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10146 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 71/2022
Swarnjeet Kaur W/o Kalu Singh D/o Late Gurubachan Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Meharwala Tehsil Tibbi Dist. Hanumangarh At Present R/o At C/o Amrit Lal Jain Vill. And Post Bhawrani Tehsil Ahore Dist. Jalore
----Petitioner Versus Kalu Singh S/o Guruwant Singh, Aged About 27 Years, B/c Kumhar Sikh R/o Meharwala Tehsil Tibbi Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.S. Deora.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Ojha.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Judgment
03/08/2022
The present transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-
wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking
transfer of restitution of conjugal rights petition filed by the
respondent-husband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act,
1955 being Civil Case No. 22/2022 (Kalu Singh v/s. Swarnjeet
Kaur) pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court,
Hanumagarh to learned Judge, Family Court, Jalore.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage
was solemnized between the petitioner and respondent on
31.01.2021 as per Hindu rites and no child was born out of the
wedlock. Counsel further submitted that the petitioner-wife is
(2 of 4) [CTA-71/2022]
residing with her mother at Village, Bhawrani, Tehsil Ahore,
District Jalore. She is saddled with the responsibility of taking care
of her old mother. There is no one to accompany her to
Hanumgarh to appear before the court. It is submitted that the
petitioner-wife has lodged case under sections 498A and 406 of
Indian Penal Code at Jalore (P.S. Norwa). Therefore, she will be
put under great degree of hardship in defending the case being
being Civil Case No. 22/2022 (Kalu Singh v/s. Swarnjeet Kaur)
pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Hanumagarh.
She has prayed that the case pending before the Family Court,
Hanumagarh may be transferred the court of learned Judge,
Family Court, Jalore.
On 22.05.2022, notice of this transfer petition was issued to
the respondent and the proceedings of the Case No. 22/2022
pending before the court below were stayed.
This Court as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay & Ors., reported in (2001)
10 SCC 41; Sarkar (Shome) Vs. Pardip Sarkar [Transfer
Petition (Civil) No.622/2007 decided by Supreme Court on
10.11.2008] Manju Varma Vs.State of U.P. and Ors. [Civil
Appeal No. 8290 of 2002 decided by the Supreme Court on
17.11.2004] and Arti Rani @ Pinki Devi Vs. Dharmendra
Kumar Gupta, reported in (2008) 9 SCC 353 has held that
Courts are required to give more weight and consideration to the
convenience of the female litigants and transfer legal proceedings
from one court to another should ordinarily be allowed. Taking into
consideration their convenience, the Court should desist from
putting female litigants under undue hardship.
(3 of 4) [CTA-71/2022]
Section 24 CPC reads as under:
"24. General power of transfer and withdrawal:
(1) On the application of any of the parties and after notice to the parties and after hearing such of them as desired to be heard, or of its own motion without such notice, the High Court or the District Court may at any stage-
(a) transfer any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending before it for trial or disposal to any Court subordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of the same, or
(b) withdraw any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending in any court subordinate to it; and
(i) try or dispose of the same; or
(ii) transfer the same for trial or disposal to any Court subordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of the same; or
(iii) re-transfer the same for trial or disposal to the Court from which it was withdrawn. (2) Where any suit or proceeding has been transferred or withdrawn under sub-section (1), the Court which is thereafter to try or dispose of such suit or proceeding may, subject to any special directions in the case of any order of transfer, either retry it or proceed from the point at which it was transferred or withdrawn.
(3) For the purposes of this section,-
(a) Courts of Additional and Assistant Judges shall be deemed to be subordinate to the District Court;
(b) "proceeding" includes a proceeding for the execution of a decree or order.
(4) the Court trying any suit transferred or withdrawn under this section from a Court of Small Causes shall, for the purposes of such suit, be deemed to be a Court of Small Causes (5) A suit or proceeding may be transferred under this section from a Court which has no jurisdiction to try it."
It is noticed that Section 24 of C.P.C. does not even require
issuance of notice to the other side and this Court, on its own
motion or on being satisfied at any stage, can pass appropriate
(4 of 4) [CTA-71/2022]
orders for transfer of the concerned case. Similar view has been
taken by this Court in Bhanu Kumari Vs. Jitendra Singh &
Ors., reported in 2007(2) RLW (Raj.) 1077.
In view of discussion made herein above, the transfer
petition filed by the petitioner-wife is allowed. The Civil Case No.
22/2022 (Kalu Singh v/s. Swarnjeet Kaur) pending in the Court of
learned Judge, Family Court, Hanumagarh is ordered to be
transferred to Family Court, Jalore competent to try the disputes
between the parties.
The parties are directed to appear before the competent
Family Court, Jalore on 13.10.2022. The court of learned Judge,
Family Court, Hanumagarh is directed to remit the record of the
Civil Case No. 22/2022 (Kalu Singh v/s. Swarnjeet Kaur) to
competent Family Court, Jalore forthwith.
A copy of this order be sent to the Family Court,
Hanumangarh as well as Family Court, Jalore for information and
necessary compliance.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 86-Prashant/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!