Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3406 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 452/2019
Shiv Lal S/o Bhoja & Ors.
----Appellants
Versus
Prem W/o Yadram & Ors.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aatish Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 28/04/2022 Counsel for appellants submits that his civil suit for
possession filed against respondent-defendant has been dismissed
by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 10.12.2018 and
affirmed by the first Appellate Court vide judgment dated
14.05.2019. Both the Courts below have committed perversity in
examining the title of appellant based on registered sale deed.
Per contra, counsel for respondent No.1 submits that
previous two suits filed by appellant-plaintiff for the same purpose
have also been dismissed.
Issue notice to respondent.
Since counsel for respondent No.1 has put in appearance,
notices be issued to respondent No.2 only.
Let record of both the Courts below be summoned.
In the meanwhile, since respondent No.1 is having
possession, both parties are directed to maintain status quo as to
alienation and possession in relation to the property in question.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /12
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!