Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3151 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 313/2021
Rakesh Kumar Son Of Shri Siyaram
----Appellant
Versus
Santkumar S/o Shri Ramsingh and Ors.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
19/04/2022
Appellant-plaintiff has filed this first appeal feeling aggrieved
by dismissal of his civil suit for specific performance, although, the
trial court has found the execution of agreement dated
11.06.2004 as proved and allowed to refund of the sale amount
with interest to plaintiff vide impugned judgment dated
30.07.2021 passed by Additional District Judge, Dholpur (Raj.) in
Civil Suit No.87/2011 (CIS No.1172/2015).
Learned counsel for appellant submits that defendants Nos.1
to 5 are co-khatedaars of lands in question and the plaintiff has an
agreement to sale in relation to the land in question for the shares
of defendant Nos.1 to 4 and at least to that extent their
agreement deserves to be specifically enforced and a decree for
specific performance ought to have been passed. However, the
defendant No.5 has sold the entire land in question to the
defendant Nos.6 to 10, which is illegal and unauthorized.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Appeal is admitted.
(2 of 2) [CFA-313/2021]
Issue notice to the respondents.
Call for the record.
In the meanwhile respondent Nos.6 to 10 are directed not to
further transfer the lands in question to the extent of the claim of
appellant for specific performance, therein.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SACHIN/11
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!