Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anoop Kumar Bathmi Son Of Kalu Ram ... vs Vinod Kumar Bhambhani Son Of Shri ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 5781 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5781 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Anoop Kumar Bathmi Son Of Kalu Ram ... vs Vinod Kumar Bhambhani Son Of Shri ... on 22 October, 2021
Bench: Inderjeet Singh
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

              S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10987/2021

Anoop Kumar Bathmi Son Of Kalu Ram Bathmi, Aged About 65
Years, Presently Resident Of Sharda Drycleaners, House No. 221,
Gurunanakpura, Dhruv Marg, Rajapark, Jaipur.
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
Vinod Kumar Bhambhani Son Of Shri Ghanshyam Bhambhani,
Resident Of House No. 221, Gurunanakpura, Dhruv Marg,
Rajapark, Jaipur.
                                                                ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Sandeep Taneja.
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. G.P. Gadhwal.



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

                                    Order

22/10/2021

1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-tenant

against the judgment dated 16.08.2021 passed by the Appellate

Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan First in Appeal No.108/2019,

whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner-tenant against the

judgment & decree of eviction dated 23.04.2019 passed by the Rent

Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan was dismissed and the petitioner-tenant

was directed to vacate the disputed premises.

2. After arguing for some time, Mr. Sandeep Taneja, learned

counsel for the petitioner-tenant, on instructions from his client,

submits that the petitioner-tenant shall vacate the disputed premises

on or before 31.10.2023.

(2 of 2) [CW-10987/2021]

3. Mr. G.P. Gadhwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

respondent-landlord on instructions from his client agreed to the

proposal of the learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant.

4. In view of the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the

writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

(i) The petitioner-tenant shall be entitled to continue in occupation

of the disputed premises till 31.10.2023 with a condition that he

would hand over the vacant possession of the disputed premises to

the respondent-landlord on or before 31.10.2023.

(ii) The petitioner-tenant shall pay arrears of agreed rent, if any,

up to 31.10.2021 within a period of six months from today.

(iii) The petitioner-tenant shall pay rent to the respondent-landlord,

commencing from 1st November, 2021, as per order of the Rent

Tribunal on or before 10th of each month.

(iv) The petitioner-tenant shall not alienate or otherwise create

third party right, or hand over possession of the disputed premises to

any other person.

(v) Further, the petitioner-tenant shall submit an undertaking

incorporating the aforesaid conditions before the Rent Tribunal,

Jaipur Metropolitan within a period of thirty days, from the date of

this order. In case of petitioner-tenant fails to submit the undertaking

as directed by this court within a period of thirty days from today, or

breaches the conditions of this order, the respondent-landlord shall

be entitled to the immediate execution of the judgment and

possession certificate dated 23.04.2019 and obtain possession of the

disputed premises forthwith in accordance with law.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

MG/112

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter