Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5772 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence
Application No.230/2021
In
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 908/2021
Maliram Jat S/o Shri Bheruram Jat, Resident Of Dhani
Natwadiyon Ki, Ward No. 6, Shahpura, Police Station Shahpura,
District Jaipur (Raj)
(At Present Confined In Central Jail At Jaipur)
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Kankhadia, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
22/10/2021
Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
The petitioner has filed the revision petition along with
application for suspension of sentence.
This revision petition has been preferred against the
judgment dated 03.09.2021 passed by the court of Additional
Sessions Judge, Dudu, District Jaipur (the appellate court) in
Criminal Appeal No.122/2018(43/2017) (NCV No.122/2018) by
which the order dated 14.07.2017 passed by the court of
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dudu, District Jaipur (the trial
court) in Criminal Case No. 1285/2015 (223/1998) (NCV
No.4949/2015) convicting the petitioner under Sections 279, 337
(2 of 3) [CRLR-908/2021]
and 304A of IPC and sentencing him to maximum term of two
years imprisonment, has been upheld.
It has been submitted on behalf of learned counsel for the
petitioner that the learned Courts below have committed legal
error in convicting and sentencing the petitioner. There is no
reliable evidence on record against the present petitioner. The
prosecution evidence suffers from material contradictions and
infirmities. As per certificate under Rule 311(3) of the Rajasthan
High Court Rules, the petitioner was on bail during trial as well as
during pendency of appeal and at present, he is in judicial custody
since 03.09.2021. Decision of the revision petition is likely to
consume considerable time.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application for
suspension of sentence.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the
evidence available on record carefully.
Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel
for the petitioner, overall facts and circumstances of the case but
without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court
deems it just and proper to allow the application for suspension of
sentence.
Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is
allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to
accused/petitioner Maliram Jat S/o Shri Bheruram Jat shall
remain suspended till disposal of this revision petition and he be
released on bail, provided the petitioner furnishes a personal bond
of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance in this
(3 of 3) [CRLR-908/2021]
Court on 23rd November, 2021 and as and when called upon to do
so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Hemant/39
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!