Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Natthi Singh S/O Shri Nihal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 5718 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5718 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Natthi Singh S/O Shri Nihal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 21 October, 2021
Bench: Ashok Kumar Gaur
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

          S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 862/2020
Natthi Singh S/o Shri Nihal Singh, R/o House No.13, Bhankarji
Palace Road, Karni Vihar, Jaipur.                  ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.        State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2.        Dr. Vishal Kirti Jain S/o Shri C.k. Jain, R/o 42/3, Ahinsa
          Parisar, Nijatpura, Ujjain, Mp, Presently R/o B-80, R/o
          Doctors Rd Hostel, Police Station Moti Doongari, Jaipur.
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Harendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Laxman Meena, Public Prosecutor.

Mr.Gopal Krishan Sharma, Adv. for complainant.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR Order

21/10/2021

The present miscellaneous petition has been filed under

Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 14.11.2018, passed by

the Additional Senior Civil Judge/Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate No.1, Jaipur District, Jaipur, wherein the Court below

has refused to drop the proceedings on the basis of compromise

as the alleged offence in Criminal Case No.166/2016 relates to

offences under Sections 332, 353 IPC and Section 3/ 4 of

Rajasthan Medical Attendance Act, 2008 (hereafter the 'Act of

2008').

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submitted that an

FIR was lodged by the complainant on 18.01.2016 wherein it was

alleged that complainant was working as Senior Resident in

Neurology Department and on the fateful day one patient was

admitted there, where the alleged incident took place with the

relatives of the patient who was admitted in the hospital.

                                       (2 of 3)                       [CRLMP-862/2020]



     Learned   counsel     submitted        that     on        the   basis   of   FIR

No.11/2016, registered at Police Station Moti Dungri, Jaipur City

(East), the Police after registering FIR, filed charge-sheet against

the accused-petitioner for the offences under Sections 332, 353

IPC and Section 3/ 4 of the Act of 2008.

Learned counsel submitted that during pendancy of the trial

the petitioner and the complainant entered into a compromise on

14.11.2018 and both the parties do not want to pursue the case

further and as such, they requested to drop the proceedings.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that vide

impugned order dated 14.11.2018, the Court below has refused to

drop the criminal proceedings under the compromise as the

offences are non-compoundable.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in a cross

case i.e. Criminal Case No.115/2018 (State Vs. Vishal Kirti Jain &

Ors.), the petitioner therein also entered into a compromise and

when compromise was not acted upon, Dr.Vishal Kirti Jain and

others filed S.B. Criminal Misc. (Petition) No.5884/2021

(Dr.Vishal Kirti Jain & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.).

This Court on the basis of the judgment passed by the Apex

Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.

reported in [(2012) 10 SCC 303] held that the dispute between

the parties is private in nature and as such, allowed the

proceedings in Criminal Case No.115/2018 and dropped the

proceedings.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present

case may also be decided in view of the compromise entered

between the parties and the order passed by the Coordinate

Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. (Petition) No.5884/2021.

(3 of 3) [CRLMP-862/2020]

Learned counsel appearing for the complainant does not

dispute the fact of compromise being entered between the parties

and further order passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc.

(Petition) No.5884/2021.

Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that power under

Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised by this Court after

considering the entire facts.

Learned Public Prosecutor does not dispute passing of the

order dated 22.09.2021 in S.B. Criminal Misc. (Petition)

No.5884/2021.

This Court finds that the dispute between the parties seems

to be of private in nature and now the complainant and the

petitioner have settled the dispute amicably and as such, there is

no requirement of continuing the proceedings.

This Court further finds that the Coordinate Bench of this

Court in the case of Dr.Vishal Kirti Jain (supra) has also allowed

the petition and proceedings in Criminal Case No.115/2018 has

been quashed.

This Court, considering the entire legal position, facts of the

present case and for securing the ends of justice, allows the

present petition and directs that the Criminal Proceedings in Case

No.166/2016, pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate No.1, Jaipur District, Jaipur, arising out of FIR

No.11/2016, registered at Police Station Moti Doongari, Jaipur City

(East), for offences under Sections 332, 353 IPC and Section 3/4

of the Act of 2008 shall be dropped, quashed & set-aside.

The criminal misc. petition stands allowed.

(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J

Parul Sharma/Ramesh Vaishnav/17

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter