Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5700 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 11853/2021
1. Vijay Mishra S/o Shri Shreechand Mishra, Aged About 48
Years, R/o Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, District Bharatpur
(Raj.)
2. Rohit S/o Ramesh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Purani Sabji
Mandi, Jurehra, Tehsil Kaman, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.)
3. Rajendra Kumar S/o Trilok Chand, Aged About 48 Years,
R/o Saini Mohalla, Jurehra, Tehsil Kaman, Distt. Bharatpur
Raj.
4. Gajraj Singh S/o Lakhiram, Aged About 51 Years, R/o
Near Pnb Bank, Jurehra, Tehsil Kaman, District Bharatpur
(Raj.)
5. Mohd. Jumme Khan S/o Rahamat, Aged About 49 Years,
R/o Jama Masjid, Jurehra, Tehsil Kaman, Distt. Bharatpur
(Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Pwd, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Divisional Commissioner, Bharatpur Zone Bharatpur.
4. District Collector, Bharatpur (Raj.)
5. Superintendent Of Engineer, Pwd Bharatpur District
Bharatpur (Raj.)
6. Asst. Executive Engineer, Pwd, Kaman, District Bharatpur
(Raj.)
7. Tehsildar Kaman, Distt. Bharatpur.
8. Gram Panchayat Jurhera District Bharatpur, Through Its
Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Jurhera,
District Bharatpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.D. Khandelwal Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Mehrishi, Additional Advocate General.
(2 of 3) [CW-11853/2021]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Judgment / Order
21/10/2021
We request Mr. Rajesh Mehrishi, learned Additional Advocate
General to appear in this case.
The petitioner, a public spirited person seeks to highlight
difficulty faced by the villagers of the village Jurehra of District
Bharatpur on account of malfunctioning of the drainage system
and consequent water logging during rain.
We have gone through the contents of the petition.
It appears that occasional water logging due to heavy rains
has brought the petitioner to this Court. According to him, though,
drainage has been constructed, it is not working properly relating
to water logging.
Be that as it may, the grievance appears to be genuine and,
therefore, it is required to be looked into by the public authority.
At the first place, we find that representation has been made to
the Collector of the concerned district.
The work is required to be looked into by the concerned
authority, who has the responsibility to maintain drainage in the
locality.
The Collector, Bharatpur shall do well to ensure that the
proper drainage system is maintained so as to avoid future
recurrence of water logging in the area. For that purpose, all
necessary steps which are required to be taken, shall also be
taken. The Collector shall obtain the report of the concerned
agency within a period of three months from the date of receipt of
(3 of 3) [CW-11853/2021]
the copy of this order and, if necessary, he will also issue direction
to take care of the problem ventilated in this petition.
With the aforesaid observations, at this stage, this petition is
disposed off with liberty to revive, if the situation so arises.
(FARJAND ALI),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J
Sanjay Kumawat-8
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!