Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashish Goyal S/O Shri Mukund Goyal vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 5607 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5607 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Ashish Goyal S/O Shri Mukund Goyal vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 October, 2021
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5508/2019

1.      Ashish Goyal S/o Shri Mukund Goyal,
2.      Mukund Goyal S/o Radheyshyam Goyal,
        Both are R/o 303, Avadh Nemi Sagar Colony, Queens
        Road, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur.
                                                        ----Accused/Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                  ----Respondent

2. Pradeep Agarwal, Representative Of M/s Advance Lifestyles Limited, Registered Office Second Floor West Wing, Electric Mansion, Appa Saheb Marathe Marg, Worli, Mumbai 400025.

----Complainant-Non-Petitioner

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rinesh Gupta with Mr. Tanay Jain for Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Mahala, PP Mr. Javed Khan with Mr. Jaideep Malik for complainant

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

05/10/2021 This criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

has been filed for quashing the FIR No.169/2019 registered at

Police Station Sodala, District Jaiupr City (South) for offence under

Sections 406, 420, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

dispute, predominantly of civil and private in nature, has amicably

been settled between the parties. Referring the judgments of the

Hon'ble Apex Court of India in cases of Gian Singh versus State

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-5508/2019]

of Punjab & Anr. reported in JT 2012 (9) SC-426 & Narinder

Singh & Ors. versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2014

Cr.L.R. (SC) 351, he prayed that FIR in question be quashed.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the criminal

miscellaneous petition.

Learned counsel appearing for the complainant

acknowledging the factum of compromise between the parties,

submitted that he has no objection if the FIR in question is

quashed.

Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the

record.

A perusal of the material on record shows that the dispute,

predominantly of civil and private in nature, has amicably been

settled between the parties. In view thereof and the law laid down

by the Hon'ble Apex Court of India in cases of Gian Singh

(supra) & Narinder Singh (supra), this Court deems it just and

proper to quash the FIR in question.

Resultantly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed

qua the petitioners. The FIR No.169/2019 registered at Police

Station Sodala, District Jaiupr City (South) for offence under

Sections 406, 420, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC is quashed.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

PRAGATI/17

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter