Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16314 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15228/2021
1. Kamal Kishore Panwar S/o Late Moolchand Panwar, Aged
About 59 Years, G 280, U.i.t. Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur
2. Lrs Of Surendra Bhansali, S/o Late Jaswantmal Bhansali,
Through-
3. Nivedita Bhansali W/o Late Surendra Bhansali, Aged
About 56 Years, 838 1St Extension, Kamla Nagar,
Jodhpur.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Education
Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan,
Bikaner.
3. Managing Committee (Shikshan Samiti Shri Singh
Sabha), Sardar Senior Secondary School Jodhpur
Through The Secretary.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.CP Trivedi
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
27/10/2021
In the wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, the
Court is functioning virtually and abundant caution is being
maintained for the safety of all concerned.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners would be
satisfied, if the respondents are directed to consider and decide
his representation keeping into consideration the judgment
(Downloaded on 28/10/2021 at 09:23:59 PM)
(2 of 2) [CW-15228/2021]
rendered by Hon'ble Apex Court in Rajasthan Welfare Society Vs.
State of Rajasthan, reported in [(2005) 5 SCC 275].
In light of such submission made by learned counsel for the
petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction
to the petitioners to file a representation within 15 days, alongwith
a certified copy of the order instant and a photocopy of the above
referred judgment of the Supreme Court. In case the
representation is filed, the respondents shall decide representation
of the petitioners within a period of 60 days from today strictly in
accordance with law while taking into consideration precedent law
of Rajasthan Welfare Society Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra).
It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
representation has been issued only with a view to ensure
expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not
be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a
particular manner.
The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
254-Sudheer/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!