Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Meera vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 16081 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16081 Raj
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Meera vs State Of Rajasthan on 23 October, 2021
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                             JODHPUR
              S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14155/2021

Meera D/o Shri Narayan Lal, Aged About 30 Years, Khatiko Ka
Bas Pokaran, Jaisalmer (Raj.).
                                                   ----Petitioner
                              Versus
1.    State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
      Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.    The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.).
3.    The District Education Officer, Elementary Education,
      District Jaisalmer (Raj.).
4.    The District Education Officer (Headquarter), District
      Jaisalmer (Raj.).
                                               ----Respondents



For Petitioner(s)              :    Mr. D.S. Sodha
For Respondent(s)              :    Mr. Vishal Jangid, Dy.GC



        HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                         Order

23/10/2021

        In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant

caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court,

for the safety of all concerned.

        Learned      counsel       for   the     petitioner         submit   that    the

controversy involved in this writ petition is akin to one decided by

this Court in bunch of cases led by Prem Bai Meena Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors. : SB Civil Writ Petition No.11136/2017 decided by Jaipur

Bench on 24.07.2017.

        Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to

dispute the aforesaid position of facts and law.

        Learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that this Court

in the case of Prem Bai (supra) had directed the respondent -

State     not   to    relieve      the    concerned          petitioners     till   their


                        (Downloaded on 23/10/2021 at 09:56:58 PM)
                                                                             (2 of 2)                   [CW-14155/2021]



                                   representation is decided, but in the present case the petitioner

                                   has been relieved though no one has joined at the petitioner's

                                   place and new circular/guidelines dated 24.08.2021 have been

                                   issued.

                                         The petitioner is directed to furnish a representation in light

                                   of   guidelines   dated     24.08.2021           or     any      other   applicable

                                   guideline/circular before the concerned District Education Officer

                                   within a period of one week, along with photo-stat copy of the

                                   guideline/circular and certified copy of the order instant. The

                                   petitioner may also point out any vacant post in his district and

                                   judgment, which he wishes to rely upon.

                                         In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid

                                   period, the competent authority of respondent shall consider and

                                   decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible,

                                   preferably within a period of two weeks.

                                         Until petitioner's representation is decided, the petitioner

                                   shall be permitted to discharge his duties at present place of

                                   posting (before passing of the impugned order).

                                         It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide there

                                   presentation has been issued only with a view to ensure

                                   expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not

                                   be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

                                   particular manner.

                                         The writ petition as well as stay application stand disposed of

                                   accordingly.

                                                                  (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

36-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter