Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15311 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 197/2019
Gopa Ram S/o Sh. Babu Lal, Aged About 37 Years, B/c Darji , R/ o Aranay , Village Karda , Distt. Jalore At Present Nehru Colony, P.s. Sanchore , Distt. Jalore (Raj) (At Presently Lodged At Central Jail Jodhpur)
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 708/2020 Ashok Kumar S/o Ishra Ram, Aged About 35 Years, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Kanwa Ki Dhani, Karda, District Jalore. (Lodged In District Jail, Sirohi).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Shah
Mr. ML Bishnoi with Vijay Raj Bishnoi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
01/10/2021
Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicants as well as
learned Public Prosecutor, on application for suspension of
sentences.
By the instant application preferred under Section 389
Cr.P.C., applicant-appellants have craved for suspending the
(2 of 4) [SOSA-197/2019]
sentences handed down by learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases
Sirohi (for short, 'learned trial Court'), by its verdict dated
07.05.2013 in Sessions Case No.06/2010. Learned trial Court, by
the aforesaid verdict, convicted the applicant-appellants for
offences under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act.
Arguing on the application for suspension of sentences, it is
submitted by learned counsel that the accused appellants were
convicted for the offences punishable under Setion 8/15 of the
NDPS Act by the learned Special Judge, Sirohi vide judgment
dated 07.05.2013. The accused appellants are behind the bars
since 6 years and 3 months, they have been convicted for the
period of 10 years and penalty of Rs.1,00,000/- was also imposed.
Learned counsel fruther submits that half of the sentence they
have been undergone and the accused appellants are ready to pay
half of the penalty amount before the learned trial Court. Learned
counsel for the appellants further submits that hearing of the
appeal will take time and there are good chances of success of the
appeal. Therefore, the application for Suspension of Sentence may
kindly be allowed.
Per contra learned Public Prosecutor has fervently and
vehemently opposed the application for suspension of sentences
and stated that 240 kg of poppy husk has been recovered in the
present case, which is the commerical quantity but not
controverted the fact that hearing of the appeal may take time.
Having regard the facts and circumstances of the case and
particularly the fact that the accused appeallants are behind the
bar for more than 6 years, which is half of the sentenced period
(3 of 4) [SOSA-197/2019]
and the accused appellants are also ready to deposit 50% of the
penalty amount, which is Rs.50,500/-,before the learned trial
Court, I feel inclined to accept this application for suspension of
sentence.
Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed
under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the
sentences passed by learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Sirohi,
vide judgment dated 07.05.2013, in Sessions Case No.06/2010
against appellant-applicants (1) Goparam S/o Shri Babulal and (2)
Ashok Kumar S/o Ishra Ram shall remain suspended till final
disposal of the aforesaid appeal and they shall be released on bail,
provided they execute a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.2,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of
Rs.1,00,000/-each (one surety should be of a close or blood
relative of the accused petitioner) to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Judge for their appearance in this Court on 08.11.2021 and
whenever ordered to do so till disposal of the appeal, on the
conditions indicated below:-
1. That they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the applicants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of
accused-applicants in a separate file. Such file be registered as
Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-
(4 of 4) [SOSA-197/2019]
applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also
be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall
not be taken into account for statistical purposes relating to
pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said
accused applicants dont appear before the trial court, the learned
trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for
cancellation of bail.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J
268-NS/Hanuman/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!