Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chhitar Lal Pathan (Senior ... vs Rajasthan State Road Transport ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 6411 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6411 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Chhitar Lal Pathan (Senior ... vs Rajasthan State Road Transport ... on 11 November, 2021
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

                   S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11984/2021

Chhitar Lal Pathan (Senior Citizen) S/o Shri Mithu Khan, Aged
About 66 Years, R/o Radha Kisahan Mandir Ke Pass, Anantpura,
Distt Kota, Rajasthan.
                                                                        ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.         Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through
           Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office, Parivahan
           Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, District Jaipur,
           Rajasthan.
2.         Chief     Manager,       Rajasthan          State        Road     Transport
           Corporation, Kota Depot District Kota Rajasthan.
                                                                     ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ghiya For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devyani Rathore

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

11/11/2021

Issue notice.

Notices on behalf of the respondents are accepted by Ms.

Devyani Rathore.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ

petition pertains to claim of the retired petitioner for payment of

overtime/gazetted holidays/weekly rest/double duty rest/due

rest/night allowances and the controversy involved in this writ

petition is squarely covered by the judgment/order dated

10.12.2019 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in SB

Civil Writ Petition No.20518/2019 titled as Ramkaran Yadav

(Senior Citizen) Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport

(2 of 2) [CW-11984/2021]

Corporation & Anr. and prays that this writ petition may also be

disposed of in terms thereof.

Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute that

the controversy is covered by the aforesaid judgment.

In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of in

terms of contentions made by the learned counsel for the

respondents in Ramkaran Yadav (supra) and the directions

issued therein.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

Manish/90

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter