Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6380 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6640/2021
Vijay Jain Son Of Shri Tara Chand Jain,
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shyam Prasad Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order 11/11/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench vide its judgment dated
23.09.2019 has held that there is no case of undisclosed income
in context to Section 271AAB. However, before the aforesaid
adjudication a criminal case was lodged as against the petitioner
under Section 276 (C)(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 wherein
cognizance has been taken and the proceedings are undergoing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that once the income
has been held to be such which is not undisclosed income, there is
no occasion to continue with the criminal case.
Learned counsel relies on the judgment passed by the
Supreme Court in case of Radheshyam Kejriwal Versus State
of West Bengal and Anr. reported in (2011) 3 SCC 581.
Issue notice of the misc. petition as well as stay application,
returnable within four weeks.
In the meanwhile, further criminal proceedings on the basis
of cognizance order dated 06.04.2017 shall remain stayed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J NITIN /84
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!