Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8090 Raj
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2021
(1 of 4) [CCOMA-12/2014]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civ.cros.obj.miscapp No. 12/2014 Smt. Tulsi Devi w/o Shri Shanti Lal Lohare, age 33 years, b/c
lohare r/o Adarshnagar south sunderwas Dist. Udaipur(Raj.)
----Petitioner Versus
1. Ganga Ram Meghwal s/o Shri Sawaji Meghwal, b/c Meghwal,
r/o village Sisavi, Thana Kurabad, dist. Udaipur(Raj.)
2. M/s Mateshwari Export, through properietor Smt. Antar
Kunwar, r/o G-01/96, A-97 Udhyog Vihar, Sukher - Udaipur(Raj.)
3. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. branch Manager branch office
Bapubazar Udaipur(Raj.)
----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2621/2012 Appellant/non-claimant
1. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. branch Manager branch office
Bapubazar Udaipur through its Senior Divisional Manager, United
India Insurance co. Ltd. Residency Road, Rotary Bhawan,
Jodhpur(Raj.)
(insurer of Bolero No. Rj-27-G-8086)
----Petitioner Versus Respondent-claimant
1. Smt. Tulsi Devi w/o Shri Shanti Lal Lohare, age 33 years, b/c
lohare r/o Adarshnagar south sunderwas Dist. Udaipur(Raj.)
Respondent-non-claimant
2. Shri Ganga Ram Meghwal s/o Shri Sawaji Meghwal, b/c
Meghwal, r/o village Sisavi, Thana Kurabad, dist. Udaipur(Raj.)
(driver of Bolero No. Rj-27-G-8086)
3. M/s Mateshwari Export, through properietor Smt. Antar
(2 of 4) [CCOMA-12/2014]
Kunwar, r/o G-01/96, A-97 Udhyog Vihar, Sukher - Udaipur(Raj.)
(owner of Bolero No. Rj-27-G-8086)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.R. Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Chopra Mr. SS Rathore
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Judgment
24/03/2021
The claimant/respondent has preferred the cross-objection
for enhancement of the amount awarded by the Tribunal vide
Judgment and Award dated 14.09.2012 passed by the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Udaipur in Claim Case No. 353/2010.
The claim application of the respondent/claimant was partly
allowed and an amount of Rs. 1,35,000/- was awarded to the
respondent/claimant on account of the injuries suffered by
appellant Smt. Tulsi in the accident which occurred on 02.02.2009.
Learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the
evidence on record and hearing the counsel for the parties,
decided the claim petition of the respondent/claimant awarding
the compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,35,000/- under various
heads in favour of the respondent/claimant.
Learned counsel for the appellant fairly submits that the
findings recorded by the Tribunal cannot be disturbed in view of
the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mukund
Dewangan V/s Oriental Insurance Company
Limited(Supra). He further submits that admittedly, in the
present case the driver of the bolero camper was holding the
driving license to drive light motor-vehicle and since, the vehicle
(3 of 4) [CCOMA-12/2014]
involved in the accident is less than 7500 kg, therefore, the driver
of the bolero was holding the requisite license for driving the
same. Even though, the use of vehicle was only for the
commercial purposes.
I have considered the submissions made at the Bar and gone
through the Judgment and Award dated 14.09.2012.
In view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
case of Mukund Dewangan(supra), the appeal preferred by the
Insurance Company being S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2621/2012 is
bereft of merit and therefore, the same is dismissed.
As far as, the computation of the amount for the injuries
suffered by the cross-objector respondent is concerned, learned
counsel submits that the claimant/respondent has suffered
disability in the accident to the extent of 15% therefore, the
appropriate percentage of permanent disability to the whole body
may be considered while computing the award.
Considering the fact that the claimant/respondent has
suffered the disability to the extent of 15% on account of fractures
in the tibia and fibula below the leg, this Court considers the
disability of 10% of whole body and the same should be taken into
consideration while computing the award.
Learned counsel for the parties have submitted a joint
calculation for the computation of the amount in view of the
guidelines of the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority dated
05.11.2018, the same is as under:-
Permanent disability 10% (25000+3000x10) Rs. 55,000/-
For simple injury (2x2500) Rs. 5,000
(4 of 4) [CCOMA-12/2014]
Hospitalization charges for 46 days (1100x46) Rs.50,600/-
Medical Bills Rs. 33,677/-
Towards pain and suffering Rs. 27,650/-
Total Rs.1,71,927/-
Less: Amount already awarded by the Tribunal Rs.1,35,000/-
Total enhancement comes to Rs.36,927/-
Thus, the cross-objection preferred by the
claimant/respondent is allowed. The Insurance Company is
directed to pay the enhanced amount of Rs. 36,927/- in addition
to the amount already awarded by the Tribunal within a period of
six weeks from today. The enhanced amount shall carry interest @
6% from the date of filing the claim application.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
36-37-Payal/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!