Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdul Rahim Pathan vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 6529 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6529 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Abdul Rahim Pathan vs State Of Rajasthan on 4 March, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4018/2021

Abdul Rahim Pathan S/o Sh. Rustam Khan, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village Post - Pathan Mohala, Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Dist. Bikaner.

3. The District Education Officer, Secondary-I, Dist.-Ajmer.

4. The District Education Officer, Primary Dist.-Ajmer.

5. The Block Education Officer, Pisangan, Dist. Ajmer.

6. The Block Education Officer, Bhinai, Dist-Ajmer.

                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. OP Sangwa
For Respondent(s)          :



                      JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                  Judgment

04/03/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

would be satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the

respondents to consider his representation to post him at a nearby

place, in accordance with law, where concerned post is lying

vacant.

2. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the

direction to the petitioner to address a fresh representation before

the competent authority pointing out vacant posts within a period

of two weeks alongwith photostat copy of the earlier

representation and certified copy of the order instant.

(2 of 2) [CW-4018/2021]

3. In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the

competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with

law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the receipt

thereof.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

157-CPGoyal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter