Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramkuwar Choudhary S/O Sh. ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 2431 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2431 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Ramkuwar Choudhary S/O Sh. ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 14 June, 2021
Bench: Manoj Kumar )
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6479/2021

1.      Ramkuwar Choudhary S/o Sh. Champalal Choudhary,
        Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of 94, Jaton Ka Mohalla,
        Shergarh, Tehsil- Masuda, District-Ajmer.
2.      Panna S/o Sh. Gokal Jat, Aged About 48 Years, Resident
        Of    73,   Jaton       Ka   Mohalla,       Shergarh,       Tehsil-Masuda,
        District-Ajmer.
3.      Kishan Lal S/o Sh. Narayan Lal, Aged About 40 Years,
        Resident of Village Shergarh, Tehsil-Masuda, District-
        Ajmer.
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                      Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
        Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan,
        Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.      The District Collector, Ajmer.
3.      The Sub Divisonal Magistrate-Masuda, District Ajmer.
4.      The    Block     Development             Officer,      Panchayat    Samiti-
        Masuda, District Ajmer.
5.      The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat- Shergarh, Panchayat
        Samiti- Masuda, District Ajmer.
                                                                   ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS ( V.J. )

Judgment / Order

14/06/2021

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they

are permanent residents of Village-Shergarh, Tehsil-Masuda,

District-Ajmer and residing for last 40 years in their constructed

(2 of 3) [CW-6479/2021]

houses along with their family members. The construction is

within the "Aabadi Area". They have their Ration Cards and other

identities issued by Competent Authorities which clearly

establishes that the petitioners have been residing on the

aforesaid areas for last so many years. They have also procured

electricity connection. The Sarpanch of the Village-Shergarh has

issued the impugned notice dated 03.06.2021 (Annexure-3),

wherein, it has been stated that the petitioners have encroached

from the "Aabadi Land" and the same has caused obstructions in

the public way.

It has been submitted that petitioners are not encroachers

and they have valid documents relating to their ownership. Hence,

the writ petition has been filed with the prayer that notice dated

03.06.2021 issued by the respondents may be set aside and

respondents be directed not to demolish the houses of the

petitioners. Learned counsel for petitioners has relied upon the

judgment of this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL)

No.10819/2018, Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as perused

the record available on file.

A perusal of the notice dated 03.06.2021 (Annexure-3)

reveals that Gram Panchayat-Shergarh has issued a notice

alleging that the petitioners have illegally encroached upon the

public way. Hence, they have been given an opportunity to show

any documents if they have in their possession otherwise

directions have been issued to remove the encroachments within

seven days.

(3 of 3) [CW-6479/2021]

It is a case where the submissions of plaintiff is that they are

not encroachers. They are legal occupants of the place while as

per the notice issued by the Gram Panchayat, the allegation is that

the petitioners have illegally encroached upon the public way.

Thus, the matter involves disputed questions of fact which cannot

be gone into in exercise of extra-ordinary powers of this Court

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Hence, no case is made out for interference.

Dismissed.

(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS ( V.J.),J

Sunita Kanwar /40

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter