Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2734 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 415/2018
Banti Alias Rupesh Kumar S/o Late Shri Radhey Shyam
----Appellant
Versus
Smt Vimla Devi W/o Late Shri Radhey Shyam
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sudesh Bansal, Advocate through VC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
08/07/2021
It has been submitted on behalf of learned counsel for the
appellant that the learned trial Court had allowed the suit of
permanent injunction and passed the decree dated 09.08.2011
accordingly but the Appellate Court vide judgment dated
17.05.2018 had set aside the judgment and decree of the trial
Court. There are substantial questions of law in this case.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Issue notice to respondent, as to why this appeal should not
be admitted on substantial questions of law as prayed by the
appellant in para No.5 of the appeal. Notice be made returnable
within six weeks.
Necessary requisites be filed within one week.
List after six weeks.
In the meanwhile, parties are directed to maintain status-
quo regarding the disputed property.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Hemant/45
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!