Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 866 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 188/2021
Ravi Kumar S/o Tulsi Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Kawai Tehsil Nadbai District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum-
Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jodhpur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur.
4. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Phalodi, Distt. Jodhpur.
5. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Lohawat, Distt. Jodhpur.
6. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Nagar, Distt. Bharatpur.
7. The District Education Officer, Jodhpur.
8. The District Education Officer, Bharatpur.
9. The Chief Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Phalodi, Distt. Jodhpur.
10. The Chief Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Lohawat, Distt. Jodhpur.
11. The Chief Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Nagar, District Bharatpur.
12. Panchayat Elementary Education Officer, Palina District Jodhpur.
13. Panchayat Elementary Education Officer, Dholasar District Jodhpur.
14. Panchayat Elementary Education Officer, Alam Shah, Nagar District Bharatpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sangeeta Mittal for
Mr. S.K. Verma
(2 of 2) [CW-188/2021]
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
13/01/2021
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue
involved in the present writ petition is covered by the Coordinate
Bench decision dated 14.03.2019 rendered in the case of Ashok
Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (SB Civil Writ Petition
No.15411/2018) and in the case of Dhanraj Meena Vs. State of
Rajasthan & Ors (SB Civil Writ Petition No.12846/2017), decided
on 15.01.2018.
2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is also
allowed in terms of the judgments rendered in the case of Ashok
Kumar Sharma (supra) and Dhanraj Meena (supra) and it is
directed that the respondents while dealing with the case of the
petitioner pertaining to their pay fixation etc. would follow the
provisions of Rules 24 & 26 of the RSR as per law.
3. The stay application is also disposed of.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
57-skm/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!