Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Kuldeep Poonia S/O Shri Kashi ... vs Union Of India
2021 Latest Caselaw 742 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 742 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Dr. Kuldeep Poonia S/O Shri Kashi ... vs Union Of India on 25 January, 2021
Bench: Ashok Kumar Gaur
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                 BENCH AT JAIPUR

              S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12470/2020

1.   Dr. Kuldeep Poonia S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Aged About 38
     Years, Resident Of D-8, D-Block, Esic Hospital, Sodala,
     Jaipur (Raj.)
2.   Dr. Rajeev Kumar S/o Shri Niranjan Lal Sharma, Aged
     About 40 Years, Resident Of 1/564, Vidyadhar Nagar,
     Jaipur (Raj.)
3.   Dr. Banwari Lal Yadav S/o Shri Birdu Ram Yadav, Aged
     About 37 Years, V/p Bhainslana, Tehsil Kotputli, District
     Jaipur (Raj.)
4.   Dr. Amit Goyal S/o Shri Niranjan Goyal, Aged About 35
     Years, Resident Of A/37, Saket Colony, Mohan Nagar,
     Hindauncity, Karauli, Rajasthan
5.   Dr. Rajeev Yadav S/o Shri Bhawar Lal Yadav, Aged About
     35 Years, Resident Of Adarsh Nagar, Krishna Colony, Tonk
     (Raj.)
6.   Dr. Rambir Singh S/o Shri Jagveer Singh, Aged About 35
     Years, Resident Of 304, Rajendra Nagar, Bharatpur (Raj.)
7.   Dr. Sudarshan Gothwal S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Gothwal,
     Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of B-29, Hari Marg,
     Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
                                                               ----Petitioners
                                  Versus
1.   Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Health And
     Family Welfare, Government Of India, Maulana Azad
     Road, New Delhi - 110001
2.   The      National      Medical         Commission,        Through     Its
     Chairperson, Pocket 14, Sector-8, Dwarka, New Delhi
3.   The Director General Of Health Services, Through Its
     Director General, Room No. 446-A, Nirman Bhawan,
     Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi -110108
4.   National Board Of Examinations, Through Its Registrar,
     Medical Enclave, Ansari Nagar, Ring Road, New Delhi -
     110029
5.   Medical Counseling Committee, Through Director General,
     Directorate General Of Health Services, Ministry Of Health
     And Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, Delhi - 110011

                   (Downloaded on 27/01/2021 at 10:13:49 PM)
                                         (2 of 3)                  [CW-12470/2020]


6.     State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
       Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat,
       Jaipur (Raj.)
                                                                ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)        :     None present
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr.Ajay Shukla
                               Mr.Angad Mirdha - for MCC (through
                               video conferencing)
                               Mrs.Manjeet Kaur - for UOI (through
                               video conferencing)

Mr.Harshal Tholia for Dr.VB Sharma, AAG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR

Order

25/01/2021

The prayer sought in the present writ petition is for providing

30% reservation to in-service doctors in the matter of admission

in DM/MCH courses.

The petitioners have also prayed for giving suitable directions

to the respondents by restoring the position of reservation to in-

service candidates existing prior to passing of the judgment in the

case of State of UP & Ors. Vs. Dinesh Singh Chouhan decided

on 16th August, 2016 in view of the judgment dated 31 st August,

2020 in the case of Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Associates &

Ors. Vs. Union of India.

Learned counsel for the respondents informed this Court that

this matter has been decided by the Apex Court on 27 th November,

2020 in the case of Dr.Prerit Sharma & Ors. Vs. Dr.Bilu BS &

Ors. (Civil Appeal No.3840/2020), wherein the Apex Court has

held that reservation to in-service candidates to Super-specialty

courses will not be granted for the academic year 2020-21.

(3 of 3) [CW-12470/2020]

Learned counsel further submitted that the counselling

process has also been allowed to be conducted without giving any

reservation to the in-service candidates to the Super-specialty

courses.

This Court finds that the Apex Court in the case of Dr.Prerit

Sharma & Ors. (supra) has rejected claim of in-service candidates

to Super-specialty courses for the academic year 2020-21 and as

such, the present writ petition does not require any adjudication

from this Court and accordingly, the same is dismissed in view of

the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Dr.Prerit

Sharma & Ors. (supra).

(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J

Preeti Asopa /Monika/57

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter