Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 615 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 801/2020
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12072/2020
Madhusudan Sharma Son Of Shri Radha Valabh Sharma, Aged
About 41 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 21, Near Stadium Charora
Colony, Karauli (Raj) Proprietor Of M/s. Baba S Kripa Agencies
----Appellant
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Government Of Rajasthan Medical And Health
Department, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Director, Medical And Health Services, Sawasthya
Bhawan, Behind Secretariat, C-Scheme, Jaipur
3. Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Bharatpur
Zone, Bharatpur
4. Chief Medical Officer, General Hospital Karauli
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Aniroodh Mathur Advocate
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Judgment / Order
21/01/2021
Appellant has filed the appeal challenging the order dated
12.10.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby, writ
petition filed by the appellant was dismissed.
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the
learned Single Judge has erred in dismissing the writ petition. In-
fact, the contract had been wrongly cancelled by the respondents
after part of the contract had already been executed.
(2 of 2) [SAW-801/2020]
Appellant had participated in the bid for supply of man power
to the concerned hospital at Karauli in pursuance to advertisement
published on 25.06.2020. Contract was executed in favour of the
appellant. However, appellant received a letter from the office of
respondent No.4 on 22.09.2020 whereby, he was informed that in
compliance of order dated 21.09.2020 issued by the office of Joint
Director, Medical and Health Service, Bharatpur Zone, Bharatpur,
the tender had been cancelled and it had been decided to invite
fresh tender for the same work.
Appellant had filed the writ petition challenging the action of
the respondents, whereby, contract executed in favour of the
appellant was cancelled vide order dated 22.06.2020. Learned
Single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ petition filed by the
appellant as the dispute-in-question was purely contractual in
nature and the appropriate remedy available to the appellant was
to approach the Civil Court. Disputed questions of fact could not
be gone into by this Court while exercising writ jurisdiction.
No ground for interference is made out.
Dismissed.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J (SABINA),J
Sanjay Kumawat-66
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!