Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mushtak Ali Khan S/O Shri Munshi ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 590 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 590 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Mushtak Ali Khan S/O Shri Munshi ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 21 January, 2021
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

              S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1691/2020

Mushtak Ali Khan S/o Shri Munshi Khan, Aged About 24 Years,
R/o Baleta, Police Station Malakhera, Distt. Alwar Raj. (At
Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar)
                                                                        ----Appellant
                                   Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2.      Victim W/o Rahul, R/o Baleta, Police Station Malakhera
        Distt. Alwar.
                                                                     ----Respondents

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kapil Gupta present in the Court For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Judgment / Order

21/01/2021

1. Appellant has preferred this appeal aggrieved by order dated

04.11.2020 passed by Special Judge SC/ST Cases, Alwar (Raj.),

whereby, bail application filed by the appellant under Section 439

Cr.P.C. was rejected.

2. F.I.R. No.440/2020 was registered at Police Station

Malakhera, District Alwar for offence under Sections 323, 341,

376, 457 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(b), 3(1)(d), 3(1)(gha), 3(2)(va)

of SC/ST Act.

3. It is contended by counsel for the appellant that prosecutrix

is a married major lady. Charge-sheet has been filed. From the

charge-sheet, it is revealed that appellant and prosecutrix were in

a relationship.

(2 of 2) [CRLAS-1691/2020]

4. Complainant has been informed about filing of the appeal.

No one has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant,

despite service,.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal.

6. I have considered the contentions.

7. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the

appellant, I deem it proper to allow the appeal.

8. The order dated 04.11.2020 is quashed and set aside and

the appeal is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-

appellant shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only)

together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty

Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the

stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to

which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of

hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

ARTI SHARMA /86

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter