Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1067 Raj
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Mis. Second Bail Application No. 8356/2020
Ramesh Kumar S/o Sonaram, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Kamboj, R/o Manewala, Tehsil Suratgarh, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail Suratgarh).
----Petitioner Versus State, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.K. Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
14/01/2021
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the
learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on
record.
The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No. 306/2018 of
Police Station Jestar District Sriganganagar for the offences
punishable under Sections 8/21, 22 & 29 of NDPS Act. He has
preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per
prosecution story, huge quantity of tablets and capsules containing
narcotic substances recovered at the instance of the petitioner is
above commercial quantity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has
submitted that the petitioner is in custody from last more than two
years and trial of the case is not proceeding, therefore, the
petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-8356/2020]
Per contra, learned public prosecutor has opposed the bail
application and submitted that huge quantity of tablets and
capsules containing narcotic substances recovered at the instance
of the petitioner is above commercial quantity and therefore, he is
not entitled to be enlarged on bail as per Section 37 of the NDPS
Act.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case, looking to the nature of accusation and gravity of the
offence and particularly taking into consideration the fact that the
huge quantity of tablets and capsules containing narcotic
substances has been recovered at the instance of the petitioner,
without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not
inclined to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the bail application preferred by the petitioner
under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is rejected.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
26-Arun/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!