Yogesh Keer vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 1027 Raj

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 392/2021

1. Yogesh Keer S/o Shri Ram Lal Keer, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Keerkhera, Tehsil Mandal, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Presently Posted On The Post Of Man With Machine Computer Operator In Panchayat Samiti Mandal, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

2. Seema Acharya D/o Shri Shiv Prasad Acharya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Tehsil Mandal, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Presently Posted On The Post Of Man With Machine Computer Operator In Panchayat Samiti Mandal, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj (Panchayati Raj), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. Deputy Secretary, Administrative Reforms (Group-3) Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3. Additional Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4. District Collector, Bhilwara, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

5. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

6. Development Officer, Panchayati Samiti Raipur, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh Rathore

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Judgment

14/01/2021

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue

raised in the present writ petition is identical to S.B Civil Writ

Petition No.10695/2018 (Gopiram Gurjar & Ors. Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors.), decided on 16.05.2018 and that similar relief

be granted to the petitioners also.

(2 of 2) [CW-392/2021]

In the case of Gopiram Gurjar (supra), a Coordinate Bench of

this Court observed as under:-

"It is further contended that for the present; the

petitioners would be satisfied, if the State- respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioners, within a time frame, in the light of the adjudication in the case of Mukesh Kumar Khatik (supra), which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive ventilating the grievances raised in the writ application.

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than ten weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed of."

In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by

the petitioners is disposed of in light of and with similar directions

as given in the case of Gopiram Gurjar (supra).

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

50-Ramesh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)