Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ganpat vs State Of Rajasthan-State
2021 Latest Caselaw 1020 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1020 Raj
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Ganpat vs State Of Rajasthan-State on 14 January, 2021
Bench: Sandeep Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Criminal Misc II Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 631/2020

Ganpat S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Regar, R/o Marjivi, Nimbahera Police Station, District Chittorgarh. (Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan-State, Through P.P.

                                                                    ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)           :    Mr. J.V.S. Deora
For Respondent(s)           :    Mr. Anil Joshi, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Judgment / Order

14/01/2021

This is second application for suspension of sentences filed

on behalf of the appellant-applicant Ganpat S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal ,

who has been convicted and sentenced by learned Addl. District &

Sessions Judge, No.2, Nimbaheda, District Chittorgarh vide

judgment dated 14.07.2017 passed in Sessions Case No.59/2015

(13/2014) as follows:-


Offence    Under Imprisonment               Fine                    Sentence        in
Section                                                             default of fine
302 IPC             Life                    Rs.5,000/-              3 Months' SI
                    Imprisonment
201 IPC             3 Years' SI             Rs.5,000/-              3 Months' SI





                                         (2 of 3)                       [SOSA-631/2020]



Learned Public Prosecutor has chosen not to file reply to the

application for suspension of sentences and proposed to argue the

matter orally.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant-application, learned

Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

The first application for suspension of sentences filed on

behalf of the applicant-appellant herein was rejected by this Court

on 16.04.2019. However, the appeal could not be taken up for

hearing due to unforeseen reasons. The appellant continues to

languish in jail since 05.01.2014. On going through the material

available on record, it is clear that the only significant evidence

which the prosecution has latched upon to prove its case based on

circumstantial evidence is the statement of Jalam Singh (PW.28),

who claims to have seen the deceased in company of the accused

soon before her death. However, identification of the deceased

Smt. Rekha by Jalam Singh is doubtful.

In this background, we are inclined to suspend the sentences

awarded to the accused-appellant by the trial court, during

pendency of appeal. Accordingly, the instant application for

suspension of sentences filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed

and it is ordered that the sentences passed by learned Addl.

District & Sessions Judge No.2, Nimbaheda, Chittorgarh vide

judgment dated 14.07.2017 in Sessions Case No.59/2015

(13/2014) against the appellant-applicant Ganpat S/o Shri

Bhanwar Lal shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail subject to the

condition that he shall furnish personal bond in the sum of

Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

(3 of 3) [SOSA-631/2020]

court on 15.02.2021 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J 23-Sudhir Asopa/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter